Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 158, Number 51: College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Regulations
December 21, 2024
Statutory authority
College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Act
Sponsoring department
Department of Citizenship and Immigration
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
(This statement is not part of the Regulations.)
Issues
In 2021, the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (the College) became the regulator for immigration and citizenship consultants in Canada pursuant to the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Act (the College Act). The College’s function is to govern the industry in the public interest and to protect the public. While the College Act provides high-level policy, regulations are needed to fully implement the governance regime for immigration and citizenship consultants.
Background
Anyone who wants to provide Canadian immigration or citizenship advice or representation for a fee or any other type of payment must be one of the following:
- a lawyer or paralegal who is a member in good standing of a Canadian provincial or territorial law society;
- a notary who is a member in good standing of the Chambre des notaires du Québec; or
- an immigration or citizenship consultant who is a licensee in good standing of the College.
Immigration and citizenship consultants have been regulated by a number of different bodies since 2005. In June 2017, in light of persistent issues with the immigration and citizenship consultants’ industry, the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (CIMM) published a report entitled Starting Again: Improving Government Oversight of Immigration Consultants. The CIMM studied the then-current framework governing immigration and citizenship consultants and found it inadequate.
In 2019, the Government of Canada — in response to the CIMM report — announced a new governance regime. This included the coming into force of the College Act in 2020 and the establishment of the College in 2021.
The College Act provides the College the statutory framework required to license and govern immigration and citizenship consultants practising in Canada and abroad, though the vast majority are based in Canada. The College does not receive funding from the Government and is entirely funded through fees paid by its licensees. The College regulates consultants in the public interest and protects the public by
- establishing and administering qualification standards, standards of practice, and continuing education requirements for licensees;
- establishing and providing training and development programs for licensees;
- ensuring compliance with the code of professional conduct; and
- undertaking public awareness activities.
The College regulates two categories of immigration and citizenship consultants, namely Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultants and Regulated International Student Immigration Advisors.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) maintains strong oversight over the College to ensure public protection. As part of this oversight, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (the Minister) established the code of professional conduct for licensees. The Minister sets the composition of the College’s board of directors (the Board) and can appoint the majority of directors. The Minister also designates a civil servant observer at the meetings of the Board.
Objective
The objective of the proposed Regulations is two-fold:
- provide the College with the regulatory framework to effectively govern immigration and citizenship consultants licensed by the College and protect the public, including by ensuring compliance with the standards of professional conduct and competence that must be met by licensees of the College; and
- help to ensure that newcomers and applicants have access to quality immigration and citizenship advice and representation, with adequate recourse when licensees do not meet these standards.
Description
The proposed new Regulations would set out the detailed requirements necessary to fully operationalize the intent of the College Act, improving the overall effectiveness of the governance framework.
Definitions
The proposed Regulations would define Act to mean the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Act.
The proposed Regulations would define a dishonest act to mean theft, fraud or the misappropriation of funds; knowingly providing false or misleading information or advising an individual to provide such information; or knowingly failing to report a claim to the professional liability insurer, failing to do so in a timely manner, or failing to cooperate with the insurer.
Compensation fund
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the management of the College’s compensation fund and how it is to be financed. The proposed regulations would require the College to pay the fund’s administration costs.
The proposed Regulations would prescribe when an individual is eligible for compensation and the application process, specifically when an application is required and when it is not.
Under the proposed Regulations, if a decision of the College’s Discipline Committee determined that an individual suffered financial loss as a result of a licensee’s dishonest act, no application would be required, and the College would inform the individual that they may be eligible for compensation.
The proposed Regulations would require an application for compensation to be submitted to the College in the following cases:
- the Discipline Committee determined that the licensee committed a dishonest act but could not determine the financial loss because the licensee failed to cooperate; or
- the Complaints Committee did not refer the complaint to the Discipline Committee because the licensee’s licence has been revoked.
The proposed Regulations would allow the College, through the right of subrogation, to assume the legal rights of an individual who received compensation from the fund. For example, this means that, under certain circumstances, the College could sue a licensee to collect debts or damages from the licensee through other legal mechanisms, such as civil court proceedings, based on losses suffered by the client.
The proposed Regulations would allow the College to recover from a licensee any compensation fees, and expenses paid. Any amount recovered, excluding fees and expenses, would be required to be paid into the compensation fund. The proposed Regulations would allow the College to purchase insurance to compensate for any compensation paid.
Annual report
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the information that the College must include in its annual report to the Minister. The College would be required to include the following information:
- its annual financial statement for the preceding fiscal year and an auditor’s report;
- the name, professional qualifications and term of office of each of the directors and changes in composition since the previous report;
- information about its committees, including their composition, and the qualifications of their members;
- anonymized information on complaints made to the College, including the number and types of complaints, the aggregate measures taken, and disciplinary decisions and actions taken;
- a profile of the immigration consultant profession, including breakdowns of licensees by location, by gender, and by official language; and
- information about the compensation fund, including the number of cases processed, the number of applications submitted, and the total amount of compensation paid.
Board of directors
The proposed Regulations would make an individual ineligible to be appointed or elected as a director if they are an incapable adult on behalf of whom a guardian may act, a family member of a College employee, as defined by the proposed Regulations, or a licensee who has committed professional misconduct or been incompetent.
The proposed Regulations would require that a director stop being a director if they meet any of the ineligibility criteria in the proposed Regulations or if they do not attend at least 50% of the Board meetings during the fiscal year.
For this section of the proposed Regulations, a family member would be broadly defined as including, but not limited to, the spouse or common-law partner of the individual, a child or parent of the individual, or a child or parent of the individual’s spouse or common-law partner, or any other relative residing permanently with the individual.
The proposed Regulations would define guardian to mean a person who is legally authorized to act on behalf of a minor or incapable adult, including a tutor, mandatary, or a person appointed to act in a similar capacity.
The proposed Regulations would define ward to mean a person for whom a guardian is appointed.
Committees
The College Act established the Complaints Committee and the Discipline Committee. While some principles related to the Complaints Committee and Discipline Committee are provided in the College Act, other aspects of their functioning would be included in the proposed Regulations.
The proposed Regulations would also establish two additional committees of the College, the Compensation Fund Committee and the Capacity Evaluation Committee.
Complaints Committee
According to the College Act, the Complaints Committee must consider all complaints referred to it by the College or the Registrar. It may, if it has reasonable grounds to suspect that a licensee committed professional misconduct or was incompetent, investigate the licensee’s conduct and activities.
The proposed Regulations would allow the College’s Complaints Committee to request an opinion from the Capacity Evaluation Committee relating to a licensee’s capacity to practise. The proposed Regulations would also allow the Complaints Committee to take this opinion into account before referring a complaint to the Discipline Committee or taking any of the measures set out in the College Act.
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the Complaints Committee’s membership. Individuals selected from the public and licensees, appointed by the Board, would make up the Complaints Committee. Committee members would need to have the necessary expertise and experience, would be appointed as independent members of the Committee, and could not be an employee of the College, a director, or a licensee who has been determined to have committed professional misconduct or been incompetent in the previous five years.
Discipline Committee
The proposed Regulations would prescribe additional Discipline Committee powers, duties and functions. The Discipline Committee would be able to request an opinion about a licensee’s capacity to practise. The Discipline Committee would be required to provide a copy of its discipline decision to anyone referred to in that decision. If the Discipline Committee determined that an individual suffered financial loss due to a licensee’s dishonest act, the Committee would be required to include in its decision an assessment of the amount and reasons for that assessment and submit the assessment to the Compensation Fund Committee.
Under the proposed Regulations, individuals selected from the public and licensees, appointed by the Board, would make up the Discipline Committee. Committee members would be required to have the necessary expertise and experience, would be appointed as independent members of the Committee, and could not be an employee of the College, a director, or a licensee who has been found to have committed professional misconduct or been incompetent in the previous five years.
Compensation Fund Committee
The proposed Regulations would establish the Compensation Fund Committee and prescribe its powers, duties and functions, including
- administering the compensation fund;
- processing compensation cases and applications, and determining compensation;
- paying compensation;
- allocating emergency funds; and
- making recommendations to the Board on the payment of any compensation exceeding the maximum amount set out in by-laws.
The proposed Regulations would give the Compensation Fund Committee jurisdiction over former licensees to process cases and applications and determine the amount of compensation to be paid.
In deciding the compensation, the proposed Regulations would require that the Compensation Fund Committee take into account the Discipline Committee finding of a dishonest act, the financial loss assessed by the Discipline Committee, or, if there is no assessment of financial loss, the evidence provided by the individual who applied for compensation. The Compensation Fund Committee would be required to consider any loss or expense associated with the dishonest act, any other compensation provided to the individual applying for compensation, and any other elements set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
The proposed Regulations would require compensation to be paid to the individual to whom it is owed as soon as feasible and allow the Compensation Fund Committee to allocate funds to an individual who makes a written request for the payment of urgent expenses while they await a decision of the Discipline Committee.
Capacity Evaluation Committee
The proposed Regulations would establish the Capacity Evaluation Committee and prescribe its powers, duties and functions, including
- requesting information from the licensee about their capacity to practise;
- consulting—with the licensee’s consent—an expert on their capacity to practise;
- preparing an opinion concerning the licensee’s capacity to practise; and
- providing the opinion at the request of the Registrar, the Complaints Committee or the Discipline Committee.
The proposed Regulations would give the Capacity Evaluation Committee jurisdiction in respect of former licensees to exercise its powers or perform its duties and functions in respect of former licensees.
The proposed Regulations would require that the Capacity Evaluation Committee consider any information provided by the licensee, any expert report, and any additional information that it considers necessary in preparing an opinion. Under the proposed Regulations, the licensee would be allowed to provide information concerning their capacity to practise but would not be required to do so.
Register of Licensees
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the content of the public register, including for each licensee, their business name, contact information, identification number, location, class of licence, status of licence, conditions or restrictions on the licence, and any disciplinary measures imposed. The register would also be required to include the name of every licensee whose licence was surrendered or revoked, and the reasons for the decision. Additionally, the proposed Regulations would require the College to provide access to the register of licensees by alternate means, and to ensure, to the extent possible, that the register complies with the Government of Canada’s standards on web accessibility.
Notice to Minister
The College Act requires the Registrar to notify the Minister when a licence is suspended, revoked or surrendered. The proposed Regulations would prescribe additional circumstances where the Registrar must notify the Minister of a licence status change, including when a licence is reinstated, if a licensee dies, or if a licensee’s membership status is inactive for any other reason.
The proposed Regulations would also prescribe when and how the Registrar must communicate a licence status change to the Minister.
The proposed Regulations would require the Registrar to indicate in the notice to the Minister the date on which the change in status of the licence occurred, as well as the following information:
- when a licence is suspended or revoked, the reasons for a licence revocation or suspension and, in the case of a suspension, whether the decision it follows is interim or not, as well as its duration, including a conditional duration; and
- in respect of a licence suspension, the particular circumstance leading to the suspension and, if applicable, any requirement specified in the by-laws made by the Board.
Exercising the powers of verification
The proposed Regulations would allow the Registrar to exercise their verification powers for the College’s quality assurance program or for random verification. The Registrar would also be required, in the case of a random verification, to provide reasonable notice to the licensee of the verification.
Referral to the Complaints Committee
The proposed Regulations would require the Registrar to initiate a complaint and refer it to the Complaints Committee when it has reasonable grounds to suspect that an individual has suffered financial loss due to a licensee’s dishonest act.
Decision of the Registrar
The College Act allows the Registrar, if they determine that a licensee has contravened the Act, its regulations, or by-laws, in circumstances prescribed in the Regulations, to suspend or revoke the licensee’s licence or take any other action prescribed in the regulations. The proposed Regulations would allow the Registrar, for the purposes of making such a decision, to request an opinion from the Capacity Evaluation Committee relating to a licensee’s capacity to practise and to take that opinion into account in making their decision.
The proposed Regulations would also require the Registrar to provide a copy of their decision and the reasons for the decision in writing to anyone who is referred to in the decision.
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the circumstances in which the Registrar could take their decision as:
- as part of their application for issuance or renewal of a licence, the licensee contravened the eligibility requirements for their class of licence;
- the licensee contravened a condition or restriction on their licence;
- the licensee contravened the requirements to be insured against professional liability;
- the licensee did not meet the standards of professional conduct and competence established by the Code of Professional Conduct for College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Licensees;
- the licensee contravened the requirements related to the maintenance of competencies and continuing professional development for licensees;
- the licensee obstructed or made false statements to an investigator;
- the licensee contravened the requirement to appear before the Complaints Committee to be cautioned;
- the licensee contravened the requirement to comply with a resolution of a process of dispute resolution;
- the licensee did not comply with a Discipline Committee decision; and
- the licensee contravened requirements under a by-law to provide required information or documents.
In addition to suspension or revocation of a licence under the College Act, the proposed regulations would allow the Registrar to take the following actions if a licensee has contravened the Act, its regulations or its by-laws
- impose conditions or restrictions on the licence;
- issue a caution and register it on the licensee’s file for up to two years;
- issue a reprimand;
- order the licensee to comply with certain requirements set out in the Act, the Regulations or the by-laws made by the Board;
- require the licensee successfully complete continuing professional development courses or any other specified course related to the contravention;
- require the licensee to participate in a mentorship program or be counselled by a professional in matters related to the contravention;
- require the licensee to pay a monetary penalty to the College in accordance with Board’s schedule of penalties; or
- take or require any other action specified in the by-laws made by the Board.
If a licensee fails to comply with a condition of licence, an order to comply with requirements, a requirement to complete professional development or participate in mentorship or counselling, fails to pay a monetary penalty, or meet any other action specified in by-laws, the regulations would allow the Registrar to take any of the actions under the proposed regulations, suspend or revoke the licence under the College Act, or a combination of these actions.
The proposed Regulations would allow the Registrar to delegate their powers, duties and functions only to employees of the College who work in the Registrar’s office, are designated and approved to act in place of the Registrar, and satisfy any other conditions set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
The proposed Regulations would allow the powers, duties and functions of the Registrar related to a licensee not complying with a discipline decision to be delegated only to employees designated to act in place of the Registrar for a temporary period, as approved by the Board.
Complaints
The proposed Regulations would allow the College to refer a complaint to another governing body in the following circumstances:
- the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a lawyer, any other member of a law society of a province, or a student-at-law;
- the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a licensee who is also a member of a law society of a province or of the Chambre des notaires du Québec;
- the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a licensee who is also a member of any other body that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession; or
- the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a member of any other body that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession.
Investigations
The proposed Regulations would prescribe how the College’s investigator is to remove, examine, copy, conserve and return things during an investigation.
The proposed Regulations would require that an investigator provide a receipt to a person from whom a thing was obtained for examination or copying, complete the examination or copying of the thing as soon as feasible and, return the thing to the person once the examination or copying is complete. The proposed Regulations would require that the thing be kept in a safe place.
However, if the investigation relates to subsection 14(1) of the Code of Professional Conduct for College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Licensees — which sets out the limited circumstances and conditions for taking possession of a client’s original documents — the proposed Regulations would require that the thing be returned to the person who owns it, and the investigator would be required to provide notice in writing of that return to the person from whom the thing was obtained.
The proposed Regulations would provide that any copy of a document or a thing that is certified by an investigator be deemed to be the original of that document or thing.
The proposed Regulations would allow the person from whom a thing was removed, or its owner to request its immediate return in writing. In response to a request for return, the proposed Regulations would require the investigator to examine or copy the thing in question without delay and return it.
Decision of Complaints Committee
The proposed Regulations would require the Complaints Committee to refer a complaint to the Discipline Committee when the complaint is not frivolous and involves financial loss suffered due to a licensee’s dishonest act, and under any other circumstance set out in the College’s by-laws.
The requirement for the Complaints Committee to refer a complaint would not apply if after taking into account any opinion concerning the licensee’s capacity to practise, the Complaints Committee decides to not refer the complaint, or if the licensee referred to in the complaint has had their licence revoked as a result of a dishonest act similar to the one that is the subject of that complaint.
In those circumstances where the Complaints Committee required a licensee to appear before it to be cautioned, the proposed Regulations would create an obligation for the licensee to comply with that requirement, such that the Registrar could take action if they failed to do so.
The proposed Regulations would require a licensee to comply with the resolution of a dispute if a matter was referred to a process of dispute resolution under the College Act and is resolved to the satisfaction of the Complaints Committee.
Disciplinary proceedings
The proposed Regulations would require the Discipline Committee — in the context of public hearings — to take all reasonable precautions to protect the welfare of vulnerable people, and the safety and privacy of any person.
If the Discipline Committee determines that the licensee has committed professional misconduct or was incompetent, the proposed Regulations would allow the Discipline Committee to take or require the following, in addition to measures under the College Act:
- require the licensee to reimburse costs incurred by the College during the proceeding;
- require the licensee to reimburse the costs incurred by any person designated by the Discipline Committee during the proceeding;
- require the licensee to reimburse fees or disbursements paid to the licensee by a client;
- require the licensee to pay a monetary penalty reflecting those amounts, in the case of financial loss due to dishonesty;
- prohibit a licensee from withdrawing funds held by the licensee or held in trust;
- require the licensee to complete training and development programs; or
- take any other action considered necessary.
The College Act permits the Discipline Committee to suspend a licence, and the proposed Regulations would limit the suspension period to not more than two years. Similarly, the College Act permits the Discipline Committee to require the licensee to pay a penalty. The proposed Regulations would set the maximum penalty amount at $50,000, or for a monetary penalty reflecting reimbursement for financial loss due to a dishonest act, an amount equal to the fees and disbursements paid by the client.
The proposed Regulations would require that the College ensure that the name of and any identifying information of a person other than the licensee is not included in any decision of the Discipline Committee or in any communication regarding the decision.
Privileged information
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the following circumstances in which the Registrar, the Complaints Committee, the investigator, or the Discipline Committee may obtain and use privileged information:
- the individual provides consent;
- the information is already public;
- the obtention and use of the information aim to allow the Registrar, an investigator, the Complaints Committee or the Discipline Committee to perform its duties or are within the context of a proceeding under the College Act; and
- there are reasonable grounds to believe that there could be significant harm to an individual and obtaining and using the information could reduce the risk of harm.
Powers of College
Under the College Act, if a licensee is not able to perform their activities as an immigration and citizenship consultant for any reason prescribed in the Regulations, the College may apply to a court for an order authorizing the College or a person appointed by the court to administer any related property that is or should be in the licensee’s possession or under their control.
The proposed Regulations would prescribe the following reasons why the College could apply for a court order:
- a licensee’s licence has been suspended or revoked or the licensee has died or is missing;
- the licensee is an incapable adult, and a tutor, mandatary or other person is authorized to act on their behalf;
- the licensee has neglected or abandoned their practice;
- there are reasonable grounds to believe that the licensee has dealt improperly with property in their possession; or
- there is another reason justifying the College’s application.
The proposed Regulations would authorize the College to make by-laws concerning
- conflicts of interest;
- committees;
- the Registrar’s eligibility and remuneration;
- the contents of the register of licensees;
- actions taken or required by the Registrar, which may include monetary penalties;
- individuals to whom the powers, duties and functions of the Registrar may be delegated;
- when the Complaints Committee must refer a complaint to the Discipline Committee; and
- Board meeting attendance.
Powers of Minister — Temporary administration
The proposed Regulations would permit the Minister to appoint a person to act on behalf of the Board, and to exercise their powers, duties, and functions, in circumstances where the purposes of the College Act are not being carried out, including when the Board is unable or unwilling to exercise its powers and perform its duties and functions.
The proposed Regulations would require the Minister to inform the Board of the appointment in writing, without delay, and the reasons for that appointment.
The proposed Regulations would allow the appointment to take effect only when the powers, duties, functions and conditions established by the Minister are posted in public and provided to the Board.
Before the appointment, the proposed Regulations would require, the Minister to
- specify the powers, duties and functions to be conferred, and the professional qualifications and experience needed to carry them out;
- set out the objectives and the timeline for meeting them; and
- set the period of the appointment; under the proposed regulations, this could not exceed one year.
Under the proposed Regulations, an individual who is ineligible based on the criteria set out for directors under the proposed Regulations or the College Act would be ineligible to be appointed by the Minister.
During the period of the appointment, the proposed Regulations would require the College, to provide any report and information regarding its activities, at the Minister’s request.
At the end of the term, the proposed Regulations would allow the Minister to reappoint the same person or appoint someone else.
Disclosure of personal information
The proposed Regulations would allow the College to disclose personal information to the responsible authorities when, in representing or providing advice related to immigration or citizenship matters, an individual is suspected of committing any violation or offence under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Citizenship Act, the Emergencies Act or the Quarantine Act.
The proposed Regulations would also permit the College to disclose personal information related to potential professional misconduct or unauthorized practice to a body that regulates a profession, a province, a foreign institution like the College or a foreign state that has an agreement or arrangement with the College.
The proposed Regulations would allow the College to disclose personal information regarding any individual involved, directly or indirectly, in the violations or offences referred to above only if that personal information is necessary.
The proposed Regulations would authorize the College to disclose personal information if there are reasonable grounds to believe that there could be significant harm to an individual and disclosing the information is likely to reduce the risk of harm.
If the College exchanges personal information with a foreign entity, the proposed Regulations would require that it ensure that the exchange of information would not result in a risk of mistreatment of the individual and that any information that was likely obtained through the mistreatment of an individual by a foreign entity will not be used in any way that results in further mistreatment, can be used in judicial, administrative or other proceeding, or deprives anyone of their rights or freedoms.
The proposed Regulations would also require that any agreement or arrangement entered into under the College Act be made available to the public on the College’s website and in any other manner that the College considers appropriate.
Consequential amendments
The proposed Regulations would repeal sections of the Citizenship Regulations and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. These sections apply to the former regulator of immigration and citizenship consultants, the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council, which no longer exists.
Regulatory development
Consultation
The College was consulted extensively throughout the drafting of the proposed Regulations, and regarding the anticipated costs required for implementation. IRCC will continue to consult the College after prepublication of the proposed Regulations. The Canada Border Services Agency has also been consulted on potential impacts to their programs and the proposed regulations incorporate their input.
Modern treaty obligations and Indigenous engagement and consultation
Under the Cabinet Directive on the Federal Approach to Modern Treaty Implications, an assessment of modern treaties was undertaken. There is no anticipated impact on Indigenous peoples for the proposed Regulations.
Instrument choice
The structural details of the framework must be implemented through regulations, as prescribed by the College Act. Therefore, the proposed Regulations are necessary to fully operationalize the College.
Regulatory analysis
Benefits and costs
An important first step in developing a cost-benefit methodology is establishing a baseline scenario against which options may be measured. For this analysis, the baseline scenario is one where the College would continue to function without a regulatory governance regime, lacking some tools and guidance to enforce certain portions of the regulating authorities established in the College Act. The baseline scenario is then compared with the regulatory scenario in which the proposed Regulations would establish a new regulatory governance regime for implementation by the College and provide tools and guidance to the College to operationalize the intent of the College Act.
IRCC consulted and worked closely with the College to estimate possible impacts of the proposed Regulations, including costs and impacts to the College itself.
This analysis examines the impacts of the proposed Regulations for 10 periods of 12 months starting the year that the proposed Regulations would be registered. For further details regarding the methodology, a detailed cost-benefit analysis report is available upon request at the following email address: IRCC.CollegeRegulations-ReglementsduCollege.IRCC@cic.gc.ca.
It is expected that the proposed Regulations would impose costs on the College for implementing the governance regime, estimated at $24,236,365 present value (PV) in 10 periods of 12 months. No costs to the Government of Canada or to external stakeholders are anticipated.
Costs to the College
The College licenses and regulates the practice of Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultants and Regulated International Student Immigration Advisors (consultants) practising in Canada or abroad. The proposed Regulations would provide tools and guidelines for the College to fully operationalize the regulation of consultants in the public interest. This would include requirements about the compensation fund, the roles of the Registrar and College committees, the framework for document management following an investigation, and complaints and discipline management, among other areas of governance.
Compensation fund payments
The proposed Regulations would require that the College issue payments through the compensation fund. These payments would be made to individuals who suffered financial loss due to a licensee’s dishonest act.
For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that payments made from the compensation fund would start being paid in period 1 with an estimated 146 payments to be made in that period and an average payment estimated at $4,652. These are based on IRCC’s estimation using recent data on discipline actions by the College, and the assumption of an increase in disciplinary actions and penalties imposed on licensees due to the proposed Regulations introducing compensation fund payments. The number of payments is assumed to grow at a rate of 3% per period. The total costs to the College in the form of compensation fund payments are estimated at $5,756,304 PV in 10 periods.
Complaints Committee investigations and additional compensation fund costs
The operationalization of the compensation fund is expected to increase the number of complaints received by the College as compensation through the fund would now be available to clients. As a result of increased complaint volume, the College would need to hire additional Complaints Committee investigators. The College would also need to hire administrators and financial experts full-time, contract legal representation when necessary. These activities would be required due to the expected increase in cases and applications for compensation resulting from the implementation of the proposed Regulations. These costs are estimated at $6,469,730 PV in 10 periods.
Document and material management costs
The proposed Regulations would establish a framework for the management of documents or other things removed by Complaints Committee investigators, including their examination, copying and return. Moreover, although the College already conducts a few investigations per year, as per the College Act, the proposed Regulations are expected to result in a higher number of them conducted each year. The additional costs related to investigations are estimated at $3,757,616 PV in 10 periods.
Increased hearings
The increase in complaints due to the compensation fund would also increase the number of hearings conducted by the Complaints Committee and Discipline Committee. The costs to the College for managing this increase include the need for increased external legal services, mediation activities, language and transcripts services. These are estimated at $2,310,934 PV in 10 periods.
Establishment of Compensation Fund Committee
The College would be required to establish a Compensation Fund Committee, whose members would have to attend quarterly meetings and travel as required to establish and administer the fund, for which they would be compensated. The costs for a five-committee members’ compensation and accommodations are estimated at $143,789 PV in 10 periods.
Additional information in the register
The proposed Regulations would require that the College publish additional licensee information on its online public register. The College would also have to report to the Minister if there are any significant changes to licensees’ information. These reporting requirements are estimated to cost the College $297,728 PV in 10 periods.
Compliance verification
The proposed Regulations would allow the Registrar to conduct compliance verifications to exercise their powers of verification under the College Act. These verifications could be performed in accordance with their quality assurance program, or randomly. These verification activities are expected to require two full-time verification officers and one compliance clerk, resulting in costs estimated at $4,984,168 PV in 10 periods.
Access to information and privacy (ATIP) requests
The proposed Regulations may increase the volume of ATIP requests received by the College. The College is anticipated to hire additional employees to manage this potential increase in ATIP requests, with these costs estimated at $516,095 PV in 10 periods.
Costs to licensees
Anticipated payments from the compensation fund may require that the College collect additional funds for the fund’s sustainability. Additional resources for the replenishment of funds could be obtained through an increase in fees. The College is anticipated to have sufficient funds for the first years of implementation of the proposed Regulations. As discussed in the Compensation Fund Payments section, the main source of funds for sustainability of the compensation fund would be penalties and amounts recovered from licensees, following disciplinary actions. As an alternative and last course of action, the College may revisit the need to increase annual fees or require the payment of other fees for the purposes of financing the compensation fund, should a compensation fund deficit occur.
Monetized benefits
Compensation payments to clients
The proposed Regulations would require that the College issue payments through the compensation fund to clients who suffered financial loss due to a licensee’s dishonest act. It is estimated that the proposed Regulations would result in 146 payments in period 1, grow at a rate of 3% per period, with an average payment of $4,652. The total payments to individuals made through the compensation fund are estimated at $5,756,304 PV in 10 periods.
Some of the clients who would be compensated may be outside of Canada. Such compensation benefits would be out of scope for the purpose of this cost-benefit analysis; however, because it is challenging to determine the amounts that would be paid from the compensation fund to clients outside Canada, payments to non-residents are included in the analysis.
Compensation fund financing through penalties
The compensation fund is funded through existing and future funds, with the main source of funds derived from penalties imposed by the College on licensees. Other sources of funds include interest accrued on the amounts held by the fund, annual licensee fees and any other source of income the College assigns to the fund. Licensee fees are set through the College’s by-laws under the purview of the College Board, although these may be used to finance the compensation fund, they are not its main source.
There are instances where the compensation fund would make payments to clients where there is no corresponding penalty to a licensee. To ensure the fund is sufficiently financed, in addition to penalties issued by the Discipline Committee, the compensation fund would also be replenished by penalties ordered through disciplinary actions for sanction and general deterrence of behaviour, which would not require compensation payments to clients.
For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that the proposed regulations would result in an incremental number of discipline actions by the College, and therefore an increase in the number of penalties imposed on licensees. The replenishment of the fund from direct penalties by licensees into the compensation fund is estimated at $1,620,837 PV in 10 periods.
Cost-benefit statement
- Number of years: 10 periods of 12 months (2025 to 2034)
- Base year for costing: 2023
- Present value base year: Period 1 (2025)
- Discount rate: 7%
Impacted stakeholder | Description of cost | Base year (period 1) | Other relevant year (period 5) | Final year (period 10) | Total (present value) | Annualized value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
College | Compensation Fund Payments | $679,213 | $764,460 | $886,219 | $5,756,304 | $819,568 |
Complaints Committee Investigations and additional Compensation Fund costs | $892,092 | $856,092 | $856,092 | $6,469,730 | $921,144 | |
Document and Material Management | $500,000 | $500,000 | $500,000 | $3,757,616 | $535,000 | |
Incremental Hearings | $307,500 | $307,500 | $307,500 | $2,310,934 | $329,025 | |
Establishment of Compensation Fund Committee | $20,000 | $19,000 | $19,000 | $143,789 | $20,472 | |
Additional Information in the Register | $200,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 | $297,728 | $42,390 | |
Compliance Verification | $673,612 | $661,612 | $661,612 | $4,984,168 | $709,633 | |
ATIP requests | $72,141 | $68,141 | $68,141 | $516,095 | $73,480 | |
All Stakeholders | Total costs | $3,344,558 | $3,191,805 | $3,313,564 | $24,236,365 | $3,450,713 |
Impacted stakeholder | Description of benefit | Base year (2022) | Other relevant year (2026) | Final year (2031) | Total (present value) | Annualized value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individuals | Compensation from financial loss due to dishonest act | $679,213 | $764,460 | $886,219 | $5,756,304 | $819,568 |
College | Compensation fund replenishment | $191,250 | $215,254 | $249,538 | $1,620,837 | $230,771 |
All stakeholders | Total benefits | $870,463 | $979,714 | $1,135,757 | $7,377,141 | $1,050,339 |
Impacts | Base year (period 1) | Other relevant year (period 5) | Final year (period 10) |
Total (present value) |
Annualized value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | $3,344,558 | $3,191,805 | $3,313,564 | $24,236,365 | $3,450,713 |
Total benefits | $870,463 | $979,714 | $1,135,757 | $7,377,141 | $1,050,339 |
NET IMPACT | −$2,474,095 | −$2,212,091 | −$2,177,807 | −$16,859,225 | −$2,400,374 |
Qualitative impacts
Positive impacts
- A clear regulatory framework to govern consultants would help the College ensure compliance and oversight of the regulated industry.
- Ensure that newcomers and applicants have recourse when dishonest acts are committed, increasing their consumer protection when it comes to immigration advice and representation.
Negative impacts
- A potential deficit in the compensation fund due to the introduction of payments could require, as a last course of action, increases to licensees’ annual fees or other fees, so that the College can ensure the fund’s sustainability. Potential increases to fees would be incurred by licensees.
Small business lens
Analysis under the small business lens concluded that the proposed Regulations would not impact Canadian small businesses.
One-for-one rule
The one-for-one rule does not apply as there would be no incremental change in administrative burden on business. The College does not meet the definition of a “business” as set out in the Red Tape Reduction Act, and any administrative obligations imposed on the College would be out of the scope of the one-for-one rule.
Although a new regulatory title would be created, it would not be counted as a title “in” under the one-for-one rule as it would not introduce administrative burden on business.
Regulatory cooperation and alignment
To assess whether there are opportunities for cooperation or alignment, IRCC identified jurisdictions that regulate similarly to Canada. The Department analyzed standard-setting bodies of relevant jurisdictions or international organizations to identify possibilities for alignment. IRCC determined that regulatory cooperation or alignment with international or domestic partners is not feasible and would not achieve the desired policy objectives. Instead, IRCC determined that an approach that is specific to Canada should be taken because no other country has a similar legislative framework.
Effects on the environment
A preliminary environmental scan was completed in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on Environmental and Economic Assessment. No significant environmental effects are anticipated for the proposed Regulations.
Gender-based analysis plus
The design of the proposed Regulations considered GBA+ implications. As such, the proposed regulations minimize potential differential impacts. Some examples of ways in which the proposed regulations do so include the following:
- recognizing that not all clients have Internet access, the College would be required to provide, upon request, access to the register of licensees by alternate means;
- in the area of governance, the College would be required to provide, as part of its annual report to the Minister, key variables aimed at increasing GBA+ data available to policy-makers; and
- for the complaints and discipline process, victim identity and private information would not be disclosed in a complaint and discipline decision, to mitigate against potential reprisals by the licensee.
As a result, the proposed Regulations would have minimal differential impacts.
Implementation, compliance and enforcement, and service standards
The proposed Regulations would come into force on the day they are registered.
IRCC is working with the College to ensure that it can implement the proposed Regulations seamlessly when they take effect.
The College has estimated the additional resources that will be required to implement the proposed Regulations, notably for investigations and to manage the compensation fund. The College is actively preparing to implement and staff the committees created by these Regulations and it is expected that the committees will be ready to function shortly after the Regulations take effect.
As per the College’s 2023 Annual Report, the College is in good financial standing and will be able to absorb the cost of hiring new staff and pay for additional fees, such as legal expenses and language services.
Moreover, the College has budgeted its finances to be able to make payments to individuals who suffer financial loss due to a dishonest act committed by a licensee from the compensation fund as soon as the proposed Regulations come into force.
Independent of these Regulations, in 2024, the College implemented a new Enterprise Management System to improve workflows and processes, and to manage data. This system would be used to include the additional information required in the public register of licensees by the coming into force of the proposed Regulations.
The College will update its by-laws to ensure they are aligned with the Regulations. The updated College by-laws are expected to take effect shortly after the coming into force of the proposed Regulations. The College would use the by-laws as instruments to implement and operationalize the proposed Regulations.
Contact
Tina Matos
Director General
Admissibility Branch
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Email: IRCC.CollegeRegulations-ReglementsduCollege.IRCC@cic.gc.ca
PROPOSED REGULATORY TEXT
Notice is given that the Governor in Council proposes to make the annexed College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Regulations under subsections 81(1) and (2)footnote a and section 88 of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Act footnote b.
Interested persons may make representations concerning the proposed Regulations within 45 days after the date of publication of this notice. They are strongly encouraged to use the online commenting feature that is available on the Canada Gazette website but if they use email, mail or any other means, the representations should cite the Canada Gazette, Part I, and the date of publication of this notice, and be sent to Tina Matos, Director General, Admissibility Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration, 180 Kent Street, 8th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 (email: IRCC.CollegeRegulations-ReglementsduCollege.IRCC@cic.gc.ca).
Ottawa, December 13, 2024
Wendy Nixon
Assistant Clerk of the Privy Council
College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Regulations
Definitions
Definitions
1 The following definitions apply in these Regulations.
- Act
- means the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Act. (Loi)
- dishonest act
- means
- (a) theft, fraud or the misappropriation of funds;
- (b) with respect to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act or the Citizenship Act, knowingly providing false or misleading information or advising an individual to provide such information; or
- (c) knowingly failing to report a claim to the professional liability insurer or failing to do so in a timely manner, or knowingly failing to cooperate with the insurer. (acte malhonnête)
Organization
Compensation Fund
Management of compensation fund
2 The compensation fund referred to in section 13 of the Act is separate from any other fund or account held by the College.
Financing of compensation fund
3 (1) In addition to any amount paid into the compensation fund under subsection 69(7) of the Act, the fund is composed of the following amounts:
- (a) if applicable, the contribution included in the annual fee to be paid by licensees for the purpose of financing the fund, as well as any other fee that is to be paid to the College by licensees for the purpose of financing the fund;
- (b) any money recovered from a licensee to reimburse the fund in accordance with section 6;
- (c) any money recovered from an insurer to reimburse the fund in accordance with section 7;
- (d) interest accrued on the amounts held by the fund; and
- (e) any other amount the College assigns to the fund.
Administration costs
(2) Costs related to the administration of the fund are paid by the College.
Compensation due to dishonest act
4 An individual who suffers financial loss due to a dishonest act committed by a licensee on or after November 23, 2021 is eligible for compensation if
- (a) at the time when the dishonest act occurred, the individual had
- (i) entered into a consultation agreement or service agreement with respect to immigration or citizenship with the licensee, or
- (ii) reasonably concluded that the licensee had agreed to provide immigration or citizenship consulting services to them; and
- (b) the individual did not voluntarily participate in, or contribute to, the dishonest act.
Application not required
5 (1) If a dishonest act committed by a licensee is the subject of a decision of the Discipline Committee in which the amount of loss suffered was assessed, no application for compensation is required and the College is to inform the individual that they may be eligible for compensation.
Application required
(2) However, an application for compensation must be submitted to the College in the following cases:
- (a) the Discipline Committee made a decision finding that the licensee committed a dishonest act, but the licensee’s failure to cooperate prevented the Discipline Committee from determining the financial loss suffered; or
- (b) as a result of the revocation of the licensee’s licence, the Complaints Committee, in accordance with subsection 34(3), did not refer the complaint to the Discipline Committee.
Subrogation
6 (1) The College may, standing in place of and representing any individual who received compensation from the compensation fund, exercise all rights and remedies that that individual exercised or could have exercised with respect to the licensee or their successors.
Recovery
(2) The College may, among other things, recover from a licensee any compensation paid in accordance with section 15, as well as any fees and expenses paid with respect to such compensation.
Amounts recovered
(3) Any amount — with the exception of the fees and expenses paid by the College for the recovery of that amount — recovered by the College for the purposes of this section is to be paid into the compensation fund.
Insurance
7 (1) For greater certainty, the College may purchase insurance to compensate for any compensation paid in accordance with section 15, as well as any fees and expenses paid with respect to such compensation.
Amounts recovered
(2) Any amount — with the exception of the fees and expenses paid by the College for the recovery of that amount — recovered by the College for the purposes of this section is to be paid into the compensation fund.
Annual Report
Report to Minister
8 The report referred to in subsection 15(1) of the Act includes the following information:
- (a) the annual financial statement for the preceding fiscal year and an auditor’s report on that financial statement;
- (b) the name, professional qualifications and term of office of each of the directors, with an indication of any change in the Board’s composition since the previous annual report;
- (c) with respect to the Complaints Committee, Discipline Committee, Compensation Fund Committee, and Capacity Evaluation Committee,
- (i) the name, terms of reference and composition of each,
- (ii) the name and professional qualifications of each of their members, and
- (iii) any change in their composition since the end of the preceding fiscal year;
- (d) information, made anonymous, concerning the number and type of complaints made to the College – in relation to the conduct of its licensees – and the number of complaints processed, including:
- (i) any measures, expressed in aggregate form, taken to process those complaints, and
- (ii) any disciplinary decision it made and disciplinary action it took or required as a result of these complaints since the end of the preceding fiscal year;
- (e) a profile of the profession, including in particular:
- (i) the number and percentage of licensees per province or foreign state where the licensees practice,
- (ii) the number and percentage of licensees, categorized according to years of experience,
- (iii) the number and percentage of licensees, categorized according to gender, and
- (iv) the number and percentage of licensees, categorized according to the official language of Canada in which the licensees offer their services; and
- (f) with respect to the compensation fund,
- (i) the number of cases processed under subsection 5(1) and, in particular,
- (A) the number of cases for which a decision to pay compensation was made, and
- (B) the number of cases that were rejected,
- (ii) the number of applications submitted under subsection 5(2) and, in particular,
- (A) the number of applications for which compensation was paid, and
- (B) the number of applications that were rejected,
- (iii) the total amount of compensation paid under section 15,
- (iv) the total amount of funds allocated under section 16,
- (v) the total revenue, budgeted amount and actual amount of the fund and any surplus or deficit of the fund, and
- (vi) an indication of any revenue sources of the fund.
- (i) the number of cases processed under subsection 5(1) and, in particular,
Board of Directors
Directors — Ineligibility
9 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 20(f) of the Act, an individual is ineligible to be appointed or elected as a director if they meet any of the following criteria:
- (a) they are an incapable adult on behalf of whom a guardian is authorized to act;
- (b) they are a family member of an employee of the College; or
- (c) they are a licensee who the Discipline Committee or the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council Discipline Committee determined, in the five previous years, had committed professional misconduct or been incompetent.
Definitions
(2) The following definitions apply in this section:
- family member
- in relation to the individual in question, means any one of the following:
- (a) the spouse or common-law partner of the individual;
- (b) a child of the individual or a child of the individual’s spouse or common-law partner;
- (c) a parent of the individual or a spouse or common-law partner of the parent;
- (d) a child of the individual’s parent or a child of the spouse or common-law partner of the individual’s parent;
- (e) the spouse or common-law partner of the individual’s child or of the child of the individual’s spouse or common-law partner;
- (f) a parent, or the spouse or common-law partner of a parent, of the individual’s spouse or common-law partner;
- (g) a current or former foster parent of the individual or of the individual’s spouse or common-law partner;
- (h) a current or former foster child of the individual or the spouse or common-law partner of that child;
- (i) a current or former ward of the individual or the spouse or common-law partner of that ward;
- (j) a current or former guardian of the individual or the spouse or common-law partner of that guardian; or
- (k) any other relative residing permanently with the individual. (membre de la famille)
- guardian
- means a person who is legally authorized to act on behalf of a minor or incapable adult and includes a tutor or mandatary under a protection mandate or any person who is appointed to act in a similar capacity. (tuteur)
- ward
- means a person for whom a guardian is appointed. (pupille)
Ceases to be director
10 For the purposes of paragraph 23(d) of the Act, a director ceases to be a director if
- (a) while in office, they meet one or more of the criteria set out in subsection 9(1) of these Regulations or section 20 of the Act ; or
- (b) they are not in attendance at a minimum of 50% – or more, as set out in the by-laws made by the Board – of the Board meetings during the fiscal year.
Committees
Complaints Committee
Powers, duties and functions
11 (1) In addition to any other powers, duties and functions conferred on the Complaints Committee under the by-laws made by the Board, the Complaints Committee may request, as the case may be, an opinion, referred to in paragraph 18(1)(c) relating to the capacity to practise of the licensee referred to in the complaint by the College and take this opinion into account before referring the complaint, in whole or in part, to the Discipline Committee or taking any of the measures set out in paragraphs 57(2)(a) to (c) of the Act.
Membership
(2) The Complaints Committee is composed of individuals who are selected from the public and licensees, who are appointed by the Board on the recommendation of employees of the College.
Clarification
(3) The individuals from the public who are selected must
- (a) not be employees of the College;
- (b) have the necessary expertise and experience to participate in disciplinary hearings; and
- (c) be appointed as independent members of the Committee, operating at arm’s length from officers of the College.
Exclusions
(4) The following individuals cannot be members of the Complaints Committee:
- (a) a director; or
- (b) a licensee who the Discipline Committee or the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council Discipline Committee determined, in the five previous years, had committed professional misconduct or been incompetent.
Discipline Committee
Powers, duties and functions
12 (1) In addition to any other powers, duties and functions conferred on the Discipline Committee under the by-laws made by the Board, the Discipline Committee exercises the following powers, duties and functions:
- (a) requesting, as the case may be, an opinion, as referred to in paragraph 18(1)(c) relating to the capacity to practise of the licensee referred to in the complaint referred by the Complaints Committee and take this opinion into account in making a decision under subsection 68(1) or 69(3) of the Act;
- (b) providing to any person who is referred to in a decision made under subsection 68(1) or 69(3) of the Act a copy of the decision; and
- (c) if the Discipline Committee determines that an individual suffered financial loss due to a dishonest act committed by a licensee and the Committee is able to determine the amount of that loss,
- (i) including in the decision made under subsection 69(3) of the Act an assessment of the amount of the financial loss and the reasons supporting that assessment, and
- (ii) submitting that assessment to the Compensation Fund Committee.
Membership
(2) The Discipline Committee is composed of individuals who are selected from the public and licensees, who are appointed by the Board on the recommendation of employees of the College.
Clarification
(3) The individuals from the public who are selected must
- (a) not be employees of the College;
- (b) have the necessary expertise and experience to participate in disciplinary hearings; and
- (c) be appointed as independent members of the Committee, operating at arm’s length from officers of the College.
Exclusions
(4) The following individuals must not be members of the Discipline Committee:
- (a) a director; or
- (b) a licensee who the Discipline Committee or the Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council Discipline Committee determined, in the five previous years, had committed professional misconduct or been incompetent.
Compensation Fund Committee
Establishment
13 A committee of the College is established, to be known as the Compensation Fund Committee.
Powers, duties and functions
14 (1) The powers, duties and functions of the Compensation Fund Committee are the following:
- (a) administering the compensation fund;
- (b) processing cases under subsection 5(1) and applications under subsection 5(2) and determining, as applicable, the amount of compensation to be paid;
- (c) paying compensation;
- (d) allocating emergency funds, as needed, under section 16; and
- (e) making recommendations to the Board with respect to the payment of any compensation that exceeds the maximum amount set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
Jurisdiction — former licensees
(2) For greater certainty, the Compensation Fund Committee has jurisdiction in respect of former licensees to process cases and applications under paragraph (1)(b) and determine the amount of compensation to be paid.
Determining compensation
15 (1) The Compensation Fund Committee determines, on a case-by-case basis, the compensation to be paid.
Amount of compensation
(2) In determining the amount of compensation, the Compensation Fund Committee must take, as the case may be, the following elements into account:
- a) the decision by the Discipline Committee finding that the licensee committed a dishonest act;
- (b) the assessment of the amount of financial loss by the Discipline Committee, following the dishonest act;
- (c) in the absence of such an assessment, the evidence provided by the individual who submitted the application for compensation under subsection 5(2);
- (d) any loss or expense associated with the dishonest act;
- (e) any amount or other compensation provided to the individual for whom the amount of compensation is being assessed; and
- (f) any other elements related to the compensation fund set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
Payment
(3) When the amount of compensation is determined, it must be paid to the individual to whom it is owed as soon as feasible.
Emergency allocation
16 The Compensation Fund Committee may allocate funds to an individual who makes a written request for the payment of urgent expenses while they await a decision of the Discipline Committee.
Capacity Evaluation Committee
Establishment
17 (1) A committee of the College is established, to be known as the Capacity Evaluation Committee.
Membership
(2) The Capacity Evaluation Committee is composed of members who are not directors.
Powers, duties and functions
18 (1) The powers, duties and functions of the Capacity Evaluation Committee are the following:
- (a) requesting information, including personal information, from the licensee concerning their capacity to practise;
- (b) consulting, with the consent of the licensee, an expert on the licensee’s capacity to practise;
- (c) preparing an opinion concerning the licensee’s capacity to practise; and
- (d) providing the opinion at the request of
- (i) the Registrar, before making a decision under section 38 of the Act,
- (ii) the Complaints Committee, before deciding whether to refer a complaint to the Discipline Committee under subsection 57(1) of the Act or before taking any of the measures set out in paragraphs 57(2)(a) to (c) of the Act, or
- (iii) the Discipline Committee, before making a decision under subsection 68(1) or 69(3) of the Act.
Jurisdiction — former licensees
(2) For greater certainty, the Capacity Evaluation Committee has jurisdiction to exercise its powers or perform its duties and functions in respect of former licensees.
Request for information
19 At the request of the Capacity Evaluation Committee, a licensee may provide information, including personal information, concerning their capacity to practise.
Elements to take into account
20 In preparing the opinion referred to in paragraph 18(1)(c), the Capacity Evaluation Committee must take, as the case may be, the following elements into account:
- (a) any information, including personal information, provided by the licensee concerning their capacity to practise;
- (b) any report from an expert consulted under paragraph 18(1)(b) relating to the licensee’s capacity to practise; and
- (c) any additional information the Capacity Evaluation Committee considers necessary to prepare the opinion.
Registrar
Conditions
21 A licensee must respect any conditions or restrictions to which their licence is subject and that are imposed under subsection 33(2) of the Act.
Register of Licensees
Content
22 The register of licensees referred to in subsection 31(1) of the Act must contain the following information:
- (a) the name of every licensee, any business name or any name under which they do business;
- (b) the contact information for any business, in Canada or in a foreign state, through which the licensee provides their immigration or citizenship consulting services;
- (c) the identification number of a licensee;
- (d) the name and city, province or state and country where any agent of a licensee is operating, in Canada or in a foreign state;
- (e) the class of licence held by the licensee;
- (f) if the licensee is providing immigration or citizenship consulting services as an employee, the name, business address and contact information of their employer;
- (g) the status of the licensee’s licence;
- (h) in the case of a licensee whose licence is suspended, an indication that their licence is suspended, the date on which it was suspended, the reasons for and type of suspension and, if applicable, the day on which the suspension will be lifted;
- (i) the name of every licensee whose licence was surrendered or revoked, and the reasons for the decision;
- (j) any conditions or restrictions on a licensee’s licence;
- (k) for every licensee, any disciplinary measures imposed before 2018, if available, and any disciplinary measures imposed by the Discipline Committee since then; and
- (l) any other information required by the by-laws made by the Board.
Format
23 (1) In addition to the requirements set out in subsection 31(1) of the Act and subject to the by-laws made by the Board, at the request of a member of the public or a licensee, the College is to provide access to the register of licensees by alternate means.
Accessibility
(2) The College must ensure that, to the extent possible, it complies with the Government of Canada’s standards on web accessibility.
Notice to Minister
Circumstances
24 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 32(d) of the Act, the Registrar must provide notice to the Minister, in the following circumstances:
- (a) the reinstatement of a licensee’s licence;
- (b) the death of a licensee; and
- (c) a licensee’s membership status is inactive for any other reason.
Timing
(2) The Registrar must provide notice in respect of the circumstances
- (a) set out in paragraphs 32(a) and (b) of the Act, within five working days of the occurrence of the circumstance in question; or
- (b) set out in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) of these Regulations and paragraph 32(c) of the Act, within 15 working days of the occurrence of the circumstance in question.
Notice provided electronically
(3) The Registrar provides notice electronically of the circumstances set out in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) of these Regulations and paragraphs 32(a) to (c) of the Act.
Form and manner
(4) The Registrar must indicate in the notice the date on which the circumstances set out in paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) of these Regulations and paragraphs 32(a) to (c) of the Act occurred, as well as the following information:
- (a) in respect of the circumstances set out in paragraphs 32(a) and (b) of the Act, the reasons for the licence revocation or suspension and, in the case of a suspension, whether the decision it follows is interim or not, as well as its duration, including a conditional duration; and
- (b) in respect of a licence suspension as a result of circumstances prescribed at paragraphs 28(a) to (j), the particular circumstance leading to the suspension and, if applicable, any requirement specified in the by-laws made by the Board.
Exercising Powers of Verification
Selection for verification
25 (1) The Registrar may exercise their powers of verification under section 35 of the Act
- (a) in respect of a quality assurance program of the College; or
- (b) in respect of a random verification.
Notice
(2) Subject to subsection 35(2) of the Act, if the Registrar conducts a random verification, they must provide reasonable notice to the licensee — chosen as part of a random verification — of the verification of their business premise or dwelling-house, as the case may be.
Referral to Complaints Committee
Dishonest act
26 For the purposes of section 37 of the Act, the circumstance in which the Registrar must initiate a complaint and refer it to the Complaints Committee for consideration is where the Registrar is of the opinion that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that financial loss has been suffered due to a dishonest act committed by a licensee.
Decision of Registrar
Decision process
27 (1) For the purposes of section 38 of the Act, the process for making a decision is, as the case may be, that the Registrar requests an opinion, as referred to in paragraph 18(1)(c) concerning the capacity to practise of the licensee who has contravened a provision of the Act, these Regulations or the by-laws made by the Board, and takes that opinion into account in making their decision.
Decision and reasons in writing
(2) The Registrar must provide a copy of its decision and the reasons for it in writing to any person who is referred to in the decision.
Circumstances
28 For the purposes of section 38 of the Act, the circumstances are as follows:
- (a) as part of their application for a licence or their application for the renewal of a licence, the licensee contravened the eligibility requirements established for their class of licence under the by-laws made by the Board;
- (b) the licensee contravened section 21;
- (c) the licensee contravened the professional requirements in subsection 42(1) of the Act or under the by-laws made by the Board;
- (d) subject to section 26, the licensee contravened section 44 of the Act and did not meet the standards of professional conduct and competence established by the Code of Professional Conduct for College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Licensees;
- (e) the licensee contravened the requirements related to the maintenance of competencies and continuing professional development for licensees set out in the by-laws made by the Board;
- (f) the licensee contravened section 55 of the Act;
- (g) the licensee contravened section 35;
- (h) the licensee contravened section 36;
- (i) the licensee contravened section 70 of the Act; and
- (j) the licensee contravened the requirements established, in accordance with the by-laws made by the Board, to provide to the College any information or document required by the by-laws made by the Board.
Actions that can be taken or required
29 In addition to the actions set out in paragraphs 38(a) and (b) of the Act, the Registrar may take or require any of the following actions under paragraph 38(c) of the Act:
- (a) impose conditions or restrictions on the licensee’s licence;
- (b) issue a caution to the licensee and register it on the licensee’s file for a period of not more than two years;
- (c) issue a reprimand to the licensee;
- (d) order the licensee to comply with certain requirements set out in the Act, these Regulations or the by-laws made by the Board;
- (e) require the licensee to take and successfully complete specified continuing professional development courses or any other specified course related to the nature of the contravention;
- (f) require the licensee to participate in a mentorship program or be counselled by a professional in matters related to the nature of the contravention;
- (g) require the licensee to pay a monetary penalty to the College in accordance with the schedule of penalties set out in the by-laws made by the Board;
- (h) take or require any other action specified in the by-laws made by the Board; or
- (i) if the licensee fails to comply with one of the actions under paragraphs (a) and (d) to (h), order one or more of the actions set out under paragraphs (a) to (h) of these Regulations, one of the actions under paragraph 38(a) or (b) of the Act, or any combination of these actions.
Delegation
30 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Registrar may delegate their powers, duties and functions only to employees of the College who
- (a) work in the Registrar’s office;
- (b) are designated to act in place of the Registrar for a temporary period, as approved by the Board; and
- (c) satisfy any other conditions set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
Exception
(2) The powers, duties and functions of the Registrar related to the contravention of section 70 of the Act by the licensee may be delegated only to those employees referred to in paragraph (1)(b).
Complaints
Referral to another body
31 The circumstances in which the College may refer a complaint to another body that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession under section 47 of the Act are the following:
- (a) the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of
- (i) a lawyer who is a member of a law society of a province or a notary who is a member of the Chambre des notaires du Québec,
- (ii) any other member of a law society of a province, as the case may be, including a paralegal, or
- (iii) a student-at-law who is acting under the supervision of an individual referred to in subparagraph (i);
- (b) the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a licensee who is also a member of a law society of a province or of the Chambre des notaires du Québec;
- (c) the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a licensee who is also a member of any other body — other than a body referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) — that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession; or
- (d) the College received a complaint regarding the conduct of a member of any other body — other than a body referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) — that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession.
Investigations
Removal of thing
32 (1) If the investigator removes a thing for examination or copying, they must provide the person from whom it was obtained with a receipt describing the thing that was removed.
Examination, copying and return
(2) The examination or copying of a thing removed must be completed as soon as feasible and, once the examination or copying is completed, the thing must be returned immediately to the person from whom it was obtained.
Return to owner
(3) However, if the investigation relates to subsection 14(1) of the Code of Professional Conduct for College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Licensees, the thing must be returned to the person who owns it. The investigator must provide notice in writing of that return to the person from whom the thing was obtained.
Deemed original
(4) Any copy of a document or a thing that is certified by an investigator is deemed to be the original of that document or thing.
Conservation of thing
(5) Over the course of the period during which the thing is examined or copied, the thing must be kept in a safe place.
Request for return
33 (1) At any time, the person from whom a thing was removed, or who owns it can request in writing to the College for its immediate return.
Examination or copying
(2) In response to a request for return, the investigator must examine or copy the thing in question without delay and return it to the person from whom it was obtained or, in the case referred to in subsection 32(3), to the person who owns it.
Decision of Complaints Committee
Referral to Discipline Committee
34 (1) The circumstances in which the Complaints Committee must refer a complaint, in whole or in part, to the Discipline Committee are the following:
- (a) the complaint is not frivolous and involves financial loss suffered by an individual due to a dishonest act by a licensee; and
- (b) any other circumstance set out in the by-laws made by the Board.
Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the Complaints Committee decides, after taking into account any opinion referred to in paragraph 18(1)(c), as the case may be, to not refer the complaint, in whole or in part, to the Discipline Committee.
Revoked licence
(3) However, the Complaints Committee is not required to refer a complaint to the Discipline Committee if — at the time the complaint was made under section 45 of the Act — the licensee referred to in that complaint has their licence revoked as a result of a dishonest act similar to the one that is the subject of that complaint.
Caution
35 If the Complaints Committee requires the licensee to appear before it to be cautioned under paragraph 57(2)(b) of the Act, the licensee must appear.
Dispute resolution process
36 If the complaint is referred to a process of dispute resolution under paragraph 57(2)(c) of the Act and the matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the Complaints Committee, the licensee must comply with the resolution of the dispute.
Disciplinary Proceedings
Public hearings
37 In the context of public hearings referred to in section 64 of the Act, the Discipline Committee must take all reasonable precautions to protect
- (a) the welfare of vulnerable persons; and
- (b) the safety and privacy of any person.
Professional misconduct or incompetence — actions to take
38 (1) In addition to the actions set out at 69(3) of the Act, the Discipline Committee may, for the purposes of that subsection, take or require any of the following actions:
- (a) require the licensee to reimburse all or a portion of the costs incurred by the College during the proceeding before the Discipline Committee;
- (b) require the licensee to reimburse all or a portion of the costs incurred by any person designated by the Discipline Committee during the proceeding before it;
- (c) require the licensee to reimburse all or a portion of fees or the disbursements paid to the licensee by a client, other than in the case of a licensee who committed a dishonest act that led to an individual suffering financial loss;
- (d) require the licensee to pay a monetary penalty to the College, up to a maximum of $30,000 or, in the case of a licensee who committed a dishonest act that led to an individual suffering financial loss, an amount equal to the fees and disbursements paid to the licensee by a client, in the form of a monetary penalty;
- (e) prohibit the licensee from withdrawing, directly or indirectly, any funds held by the licensee, or funds held in trust;
- (f) require the licensee to successfully complete training and development programs; or
- (g) take any other action considered necessary in the circumstances for the public interest and to protect the public.
Suspension period
(2) The period during which the licensee’s licence can be suspended under paragraph 69(3)(b) of the Act is not more than two years.
Maximum amount — penalty
(3) The amount that can be required as a penalty under paragraph 69(3)(d) of the Act is not more than $50,000.
Redactions
39 For the purposes of subsection 69(5) of the Act, the College must ensure that the name of and any other information that could lead to the identification of a person other than the licensee is not included in any decision of the Discipline Committee, and reasons for the decision made available on the College’s website or in any other communication regarding the decision.
Privileged Information
Circumstances for obtention and use of privileged information
40 The Registrar, Complaints Committee, investigator or Discipline Committee may obtain and use privileged information in the following circumstances:
- (a) the individual to whom it relates consents to its obtention and use;
- (b) the obtention and use relates to information that is already public;
- (c) the obtention and use aims to allow for the exercise of powers and the performances of duties and functions of the Registrar, investigator, Complaints Committee or Discipline Committee provided for in the Act, these Regulations or the by-laws made by the Board, as the case may be;
- (d) the obtention and use falls within the context of a proceeding under the Act; and
- (e) there are reasonable grounds to believe that significant harm could be caused to an individual and that the obtention and use of privileged information is likely to reduce the risk of harm.
Powers of College
Order
41 For the purposes of subsection 73.1(1) of the Act, the reasons for which the College may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction for an order are the following:
- (a) the licensee’s licence has been suspended or revoked;
- (b) the licensee has died or is missing;
- (c) the licensee is an incapable adult with respect to whom a person is legally authorized to act on behalf of, including a tutor, mandatary under a protection mandate or any person who is appointed to act in a similar capacity;
- (d) the licensee has neglected or abandoned their practice;
- (e) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the licensee has or may have dealt improperly with property that is or should be in the possession or control of the licensee, or any other property; or
- (f) there is any other reason justifying the College’s application to any court of competent jurisdiction under subsection 73.1(1) of the Act for an order carry out its purpose under the Act.
Authorization to make by-laws
42 Subject to the Act and these Regulations, the College is authorized to make by-laws
- (a) respecting the conflicts of interest of directors, members of the Complaints Committee, members of the Discipline Committee and members of any other committees of the College, including the management of such conflicts of interest;
- (b) respecting the Complaints Committee, Discipline Committee and any other committees of the College, including the powers, duties and functions of those committees, the eligibility requirements for membership in them, and the remuneration, terms and removal of members;
- (c) respecting the eligibility requirements to be appointed as Registrar and the Registrar’s remuneration;
- (d) respecting the contents of the register of licensees and the manner in which the register is to be made available to the public;
- (e) respecting the actions that may be taken or required by the Registrar under section 38 of the Act, which may include the requirement to pay a monetary penalty, and specifying the amount or maximum amount of such a penalty, in establishing a schedule based on the following elements:
- (i) the monetary penalties under section 38 of the Act are lower than those set by the Discipline Committee,
- (ii) the penalty scale is graduated based on repeated failures to comply with the same requirement, and
- (iii) the monetary penalties increase based on the severity of the failure to comply with a requirement;
- (f) limiting the individuals to whom the powers, duties and functions conferred on the Registrar may be delegated;
- (g) prescribing the circumstances in which the Complaints Committee must refer a complaint, in whole or in part, to the Discipline Committee; and
- (h) prescribing any other percentage higher than that set out in paragraph 10(b).
Powers of Minister — Temporary Administration
Circumstances surrounding appointment
43 (1) The circumstance in which the Minister may, for the purposes of section 75 of the Act, appoint a person to act on behalf of the Board is that the Minister determines that the purposes of the Act are not being carried out, including when the Board is unable or unwilling to exercise its powers and perform its duties and functions.
Notice
(2) The Minister must inform the Board of the appointment in writing, without delay, and the reasons for that appointment.
Effective date
(3) The appointment takes effect only when the powers, duties, functions and conditions established by the Minister under subsection 44(1) are posted in public and provided to the Board.
Powers, duties, functions and conditions
44 (1) Before the appointment, the Minister must
- (a) specify the powers, duties and functions to be conferred;
- (b) set out the objectives and the timeline for meeting them;
- (c) establish the professional qualifications and experience, and any other eligibility requirements, considered necessary to carry out the powers, duties and functions conferred; and
- (d) set the period of the appointment.
Additional condition
(2) In addition to the conditions set out in paragraph (1)(c), any person appointed must not be an ineligible individual under subsection 9(1) of these Regulations or section 20 of the Act.
Period
(3) The appointment is for a period of not more than one year.
Reports and information
(4) During the period of the appointment, the College must provide, at the Minister’s request, any report and information regarding its activities.
Reappointment or new appointment
45 At the end of the term set out under paragraph 44(1)(d), if the Minister determines that the objectives that they set out have not been carried out or that new objectives are to be met, they may reappoint the same person, or appoint someone else, for a period of not more than one year.
Disclosure of Personal Information
Disclosure authorized
46 (1) If, in representing or providing advice relating to immigration or citizenship matters, an individual is suspected of committing any violation or offence under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Citizenship Act, the Emergencies Act or the Quarantine Act, or under any Regulations made under those Acts, the College may disclose personal information relevant to that violation or offence to the authorities responsible for the administration or enforcement of those laws or regulations.
Professional misconduct or unauthorized practice
(2) The College may disclose personal information related to potential professional misconduct or unauthorized practice of an individual engaged in providing immigration or citizenship consulting services
- (a) to any body that has a statutory duty to regulate a profession if the information disclosed is relevant to that body;
- (b) to any province; or
- (c) to any foreign institution with powers, duties and functions similar to those of the College or to any foreign state with which the College has entered into an agreement or arrangement in accordance with subsection 73.5(1) of the Act.
Only necessary information
(3) The College may disclose personal information regarding any individual involved, directly or indirectly, in the violations or offences referred to in subsection (1) or the professional misconduct or unauthorized practice referred to in subsection (2) only if that information is necessary for the application of that subsection.
Risk of harm
47 The College may disclose any personal information if there are reasonable grounds to believe that there could be a significant risk of harm to an individual if the disclosure is not made and that making the disclosure is likely to reduce the risk.
Information sharing with foreign entity
48 If the College exchanges personal information with a foreign entity, it must ensure
- (a) that the exchange of information would not result in a substantial risk of mistreatment of an individual by a foreign entity, unless the risk can be fully mitigated; and
- (b) that any information that was likely obtained through the mistreatment of an individual by a foreign entity will not be used in any way that
- (i) creates a substantial risk of further mistreatment,
- (ii) can be used as evidence in any judicial, administrative or other proceeding, or
- (iii) deprives anyone of their rights or freedoms.
Available to public
49 Any agreement or arrangement entered into under subsection 73.5(1) of the Act must be made available to the public on the College’s website and in any other manner that the College considers appropriate.
Consequential Amendments
Citizenship Regulations
50 Section 26.2 of the Citizenship Regulations footnote 1 is repealed.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations
51 Division 5 of Part 2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations footnote 2 is repealed.
Coming into Force
Registration
52 These Regulations come into force on the day on which they are registered.
Terms of use and Privacy notice
Terms of use
It is your responsibility to ensure that the comments you provide do not:
- contain personal information
- contain protected or classified information of the Government of Canada
- express or incite discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, sexual orientation or against any other group protected under the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- contain hateful, defamatory, or obscene language
- contain threatening, violent, intimidating or harassing language
- contain language contrary to any federal, provincial or territorial laws of Canada
- constitute impersonation, advertising or spam
- encourage or incite any criminal activity
- contain external links
- contain a language other than English or French
- otherwise violate this notice
The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to review and remove personal information, hate speech, or other information deemed inappropriate for public posting as listed above.
Confidential Business Information should only be posted in the specific Confidential Business Information text box. In general, Confidential Business Information includes information that (i) is not publicly available, (ii) is treated in a confidential manner by the person to whose business the information relates, and (iii) has actual or potential economic value to the person or their competitors because it is not publicly available and whose disclosure would result in financial loss to the person or a material gain to their competitors. Comments that you provide in the Confidential Business Information section that satisfy this description will not be made publicly available. The federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change retains the right to post the comment publicly if it is not deemed to be Confidential Business Information.
Your comments will be posted on the Canada Gazette website for public review. However, you have the right to submit your comments anonymously. If you choose to remain anonymous, your comments will be made public and attributed to an anonymous individual. No other information about you will be made publicly available.
Comments will remain posted on the Canada Gazette website for at least 10 years.
Please note that communication by email is not secure, if the attachment you wish to send contains sensitive information, please contact the departmental email to discuss ways in which you can transmit sensitive information.
Privacy notice
The information you provide is collected under the authority of the Financial Administration Act, the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act, the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement Implementation Act,and applicable regulators’ enabling statutes for the purpose of collecting comments related to the proposed regulatory changes. Your comments and documents are collected for the purpose of increasing transparency in the regulatory process and making Government more accessible to Canadians.
Personal information submitted is collected, used, disclosed, retained, and protected from unauthorized persons and/or agencies pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act and the Privacy Regulations. Individual names that are submitted will not be posted online but will be kept for contact if needed. The names of organizations that submit comments will be posted online.
Submitted information, including personal information, will be accessible to Public Services and Procurement Canada, who is responsible for the Canada Gazette webpage, and the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.
You have the right of access to and correction of your personal information. To seek access or correction of your personal information, contact the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Office of the federal institution managing the proposed regulatory change.
You have the right to file a complaint to the Privacy Commission of Canada regarding any federal institution’s handling of your personal information.
The personal information provided is included in Personal Information Bank PSU 938 Outreach Activities. Individuals requesting access to their personal information under the Privacy Act should submit their request to the appropriate regulator with sufficient information for that federal institution to retrieve their personal information. For individuals who choose to submit comments anonymously, requests for their information may not be reasonably retrievable by the government institution.