ARCHIVED — Vol. 147, No. 12 — March 23, 2013

COMMISSIONS

CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY

SPECIAL IMPORT MEASURES ACT

Certain unitized wall modules — Decision

On March 4, 2013, pursuant to subsection 31(1) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the President, Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), initiated investigations into the alleged injurious dumping and subsidizing of unitized wall modules, with or without infill, including fully assembled frames, with or without fasteners, trims, cover caps, window operators, gaskets, load transfer bars, sunshades and anchor assemblies; excluding non-unitized building envelope systems such as stick systems and point-fixing systems, originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China.

Since January 1, 2012, the goods in question are usually classified under the following Harmonized System subheading numbers:

  • 7610.10.00 
  • 7610.90.10 
  • 7610.90.90

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (Tribunal) will conduct a preliminary inquiry into the question of injury to the Canadian industry. The Tribunal will make a decision within 60 days of the date of initiation. If the Tribunal concludes that the evidence does not disclose a reasonable indication of injury, the investigations will be terminated.

Information

The Statement of Reasons regarding this decision will be issued within 15 days following the decision and will be available on the CBSA’s Web site at www.cbsa.gc.ca/sima or by contacting Robert Wright at 613-954-1643 or Dean Pollard at 613-954-7410 or by fax at 613-948-4844.

Representations

Interested persons are invited to file written submissions presenting facts, arguments and evidence relevant to the alleged dumping or subsidizing. Written submissions should be forwarded to the Canada Border Services Agency, Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate, SIMA Registry and Disclosure Unit, 100 Metcalfe Street, 11th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L8. To be given consideration in these investigations, this information should be received by April 11, 2013.

Any information submitted by interested persons concerning these investigations will be considered public information unless clearly marked confidential. When a submission is marked confidential, a non-confidential edited version of the submission also must be provided.

Ottawa, March 4, 2013

CATERINA ARDITO-TOFFOLO
Acting Director General
Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate

[12-1-o]

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of a charity

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charity listed below revoking it for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b), 168(1)(c), 168(1)(d) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the organization listed below and that the revocation of registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.

Business Number

Name/Address

865960777RR0001

HOMEFRONT CANCER SERVICES, STONEY CREEK, ONT.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[12-1-o]

CANADA REVENUE AGENCY

INCOME TAX ACT

Revocation of registration of charities

The following notice of proposed revocation was sent to the charities listed below revoking them for failure to meet the parts of the Income Tax Act as listed in this notice:

“Notice is hereby given, pursuant to paragraphs 168(1)(b) and 168(1)(e) of the Income Tax Act, that I propose to revoke the registration of the organizations listed below under subsection 149.1(2) of the Income Tax Act and that the revocation of registration is effective on the date of publication of this notice.”

Business Number

Name/Adresse

118970045RR0001

INTERIOR ALZHEIMER SUPPORT SOCIETY, KELOWNA, B.C.

122291479RR0001

THE WORLD JOB AND FOOD BANK INC., CALGARY, ALTA.

CATHY HAWARA
Director General
Charities Directorate

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

APPEALS

Notice No. HA-2012-024

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) will hold public hearings to consider the appeals referenced hereunder. The hearings will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 1, 18th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908 to obtain further information and to confirm that these hearings will be held as scheduled.

Customs Act

Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing:  April 16, 2013

Appeal Nos.:  AP-2012-041 and AP-2012-042

Goods in Issue:

Solar Cattail and Mushroom Garden Lights (Model Nos. 733333 and 686833)

Issue

Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 9405.40.90 as other electric lamps and lighting fittings, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 7013.99.00 as other glassware of a kind used for table, kitchen, toilet, office, indoor decoration or similar purposes, as claimed by Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.

Tariff Items at Issue:

Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.—7013.99.00
President of the Canada Border Services Agency—9405.40.90

Special Import Measures Act

Regal Ideas Inc. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency

Date of Hearing:  April 23, 2013

Appeal No.:  AP-2012-025 AP-2012-025

Goods in Issue:  Railing systems

Issue:

Whether the goods in issue have a powder coat finish which is certified to meet the American Architectural Manufacturers Association 2603 standard and are therefore excluded from the Tribunal’s findings in Inquiry No. NQ-2008-003.

March 15, 2013

By order of the Tribunal
ERIC WILDHABER
Secretary

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

COMMENCEMENT OF PRELIMINARY INJURY INQUIRY

Unitized wall modules

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice that, pursuant to subsection 34(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), the Tribunal has initiated a preliminary injury inquiry (Preliminary Injury Inquiry No. PI-2012-006) to determine whether the evidence discloses a reasonable indication that the alleged injurious dumping and subsidizing of unitized wall modules, with or without infill, including fully assembled frames, with or without fasteners, trims, cover caps, window operators, gaskets, load transfer bars, sunshades and anchor assemblies, excluding non-unitized building envelope systems, such as stick systems and point-fixing systems, originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China (the subject goods), have caused injury or retardation or are threatening to cause injury, as these words are defined in SIMA.

The Tribunal’s preliminary injury inquiry will be conducted by way of written submissions. Each person or government wishing to participate in the preliminary injury inquiry must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2013. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in the preliminary injury inquiry must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2013.

On March 21, 2013, the Tribunal will issue a List of Participants. Counsel and parties are required to serve their respective submissions on each other on the dates outlined below. Public submissions are to be served on counsel and those parties who are not represented by counsel. Confidential submissions are to be served only on counsel who have access to the confidential record, and who have filed an undertaking with the Tribunal. This information will be included in the List of Participants. Ten copies of all submissions must be served on the Tribunal.

Submissions by parties opposed to the complaint must be filed not later than noon, on April 8, 2013. The complainants may make submissions in response to the submissions of parties opposed to the complaint not later than noon, on April 16, 2013. At that time, parties in support of the complaint may also make submissions to the Tribunal.

In accordance with section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must, among other things, submit a non-confidential edited version or summary of the information designated as confidential, or a statement indicating why such a version or summary cannot be made.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, 333 Laurier Avenue W, 15th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Further details regarding this preliminary injury inquiry, including the schedule of key events, are contained in the documents entitled “Additional Information” and “Preliminary Injury Inquiry Schedule”, appended to the notice of commencement of preliminary injury inquiry, available on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca.

Ottawa, March 5, 2013

GILLIAN BURNETT
Acting Secretary

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL

EXPIRY OF ORDER

Hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy steel plate

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) hereby gives notice, pursuant to subsection 76.03(2) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), that its order made on January 8, 2009, in Expiry Review No. RR-2008-002, continuing, without amendment, the finding made on January 9, 2004, in Inquiry No. NQ-2003-002, concerning the dumping of hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy steel plate not further manufactured than hot-rolled, heat-treated or not, in cut lengths in widths from 24 inches (+/-610 mm) to 152 inches (+/-3 860 mm) inclusive and in thicknesses from 0.187 inch (+/-4.75 mm) to 4 inches (+/-101.6 mm) inclusive, originating in or exported from the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Romania, excluding plate produced to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) specifications A515 and A516M/A516 Grade 70 in thicknesses greater than 3.125 inches (+/-79.3 mm), universal mill plate, plate for use in the manufacture of pipe and plate having a rolled, raised figure at regular intervals on the surface (also known as floor plate), is scheduled to expire (Expiry No. LE-2012-006) on January 7, 2014. Under SIMA, findings of injury or threat of injury and the associated special protection in the form of anti-dumping or countervailing duties expire five years from the date of the last order or finding, unless an expiry review has been initiated before that date.

The Tribunal’s expiry proceeding will be conducted by way of written submissions. Any firm, organization, person or government wishing to participate as a party in these proceedings must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2013. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in these proceedings must also file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before March 20, 2013.

On March 21, 2013, the Tribunal will issue a List of Participants. Counsel and parties are required to serve their respective submissions on each other on the dates outlined below. Public submissions are to be served on counsel and those parties who are not represented by counsel. Confidential submissions are to be served only on counsel who have access to the confidential record and who have filed an Undertaking with the Tribunal. This information will be included in the List of Participants. Ten copies of all submissions must be served on the Tribunal.

Parties requesting or opposing the initiation of an expiry review of said order shall file their written public submissions containing relevant information, opinions and arguments with the Secretary of the Tribunal, counsel and parties of record no later than March 25, 2013. Where there are opposing views, each party that filed a submission in response to the notice of expiry will be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the representations of other parties. Parties wishing to respond to the submissions must do so no later than April 10, 2013.

In accordance with section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must, among other things, submit a non-confidential edited version or summary of the information designated as confidential, or a statement indicating why such a summary cannot be made.

The Tribunal will issue a decision on April 24, 2013, on whether an expiry review is warranted. If the Tribunal decides that an expiry review is not warranted, the order will expire on its scheduled expiry date. The Tribunal will issue its reasons no later than 15 days after its decision. If the Tribunal decides to initiate an expiry review, it will issue a notice of expiry review.

Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, 333 Laurier Avenue W, 15th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).

Further details regarding this proceeding are contained in the document entitled “Additional Information,” which is appended to the Notice of Expiry of Order, Expiry No. LE-2012-006, and is available on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca.

Ottawa, March 5, 2013

GILLIAN BURNETT
Acting Secretary

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES

The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”

To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.

The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

PART 1 APPLICATIONS

The following applications were posted on the Commission’s Web site between March 8, 2013, and March 14, 2013:

  • The JOY FM Network Inc.
    Fredericton, New Brunswick
    2013-0440-2
    Technical amendment for CIXN-FM
    Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: April 12, 2013

  • Soundview Entertainment Inc.
    Across Canada
    2013-0423-7
    Addition to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution for TV Naija
    Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: April 10, 2013

  • Soundview Entertainment Inc.
    Across Canada
    2013-0424-5
    Addition to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution for Afrotainment Music HD
    Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: April 10, 2013

  • Soundview Entertainment Inc.
    Across Canada
    2013-0425-3
    Addition to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution for Afrotainment HD
    Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: April 10, 2013

  • Soundview Entertainment Inc.
    Across Canada
    2013-0426-1
    Addition to the list of non-Canadian programming services authorized for distribution for Africa Box Office
    Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: April 10, 2013

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

ORDER

2013-126 March 15, 2013

OWN Inc. Across Canada

Mandatory order, pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the Broadcasting Act, to come into compliance forthwith and to comply at all times within the term of the licence granted in Broadcasting Decision 2011-446, with the condition of its licence relating to its nature of service definition.

[12-1-o]

CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

DECISIONS

The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.

  • 2013-113 March 11, 2013

    Radio Vallacquoise inc.
    Val-des-Lacs, Quebec

    Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate a French-language low-power developmental community FM radio station in Val-des-Lacs.

  • 2013-116 March 12, 2013

    Arctic Radio (1982) Limited
    Thompson, Manitoba

    Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate a new English-language FM radio station in Thompson to replace its AM station CHTM.

  • 2013-117 March 12, 2013

    Arctic Radio (1982) Limited
    The Pas, Manitoba

    Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate a new English-language FM radio station in The Pas to replace its AM station CJAR.

  • 2013-118 March 12, 2013

    Arctic Radio (1982) Limited
    Flin Flon, Manitoba

    Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate a new English-language FM radio station in Flin Flon to replace its AM station CFAR.

  • 2013-122 March 14, 2013

    Knowledge-West Communications Corporation
    Across Canada

    Approved — Application to increase the level of animation programming on the Category 2 specialty programming undertaking BBC Kids from 25% to 50%.

  • 2013-123 March 14, 2013

    RNC MEDIA Inc.
    Montréal, Quebec

    Denied — Application to convert the specialty format of the French-language commercial radio station CKLX-FM Montréal, focused on jazz and blues, to a specialty spoken word format.

  • 2013-125 March 15, 2013

    OWN Inc.
    Across Canada

    Issuance of a mandatory order requiring OWN Inc. to ensure that OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network complies with its nature of service definition.

  • 2013-127 March 15, 2013

    MZ Media Inc.
    Collingwood, Ontario

    Approved — Application to operate CFMO-FM Collingwood at 102.9 MHz.

    Georgina Island First Nations Communications
    Georgina Island, Ontario

    Approved — Application to change the frequency of CFGI-FM Georgina Island from 102.7 MHz to 92.3 MHz.

[12-1-o]

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT

Decisions, undertakings and orders on claims for exemption

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the decisions of the screening officer, respecting each claim for exemption and the relevant material safety data sheet (MSDS) and (where applicable) the label, listed below.

Claimant

Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS)

Registry Number

MSDS Preparation Date (As shown on the MSDS)

Date of Decision

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M ™ SCOTCH-WELD ™ STRUCTURAL PRIMER EC-3964

8032

2012/01/25

April 19, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M ™ SCOTCH-WELD ™ PLASTIC ADHESIVE 2262

8043

2010/11/17

April 19, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia

MF BASEMUL

8070

26 November, 2010

April 25, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

LUBAD 669

8108

28 February, 2011

June 29, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptions™ KX White

8115

2011/03/11

April 18, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptions™ EU Phthalo Blue

8122

2011/03/11

May 11, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

PureOptions™ J

8123

2011/03/11

May 11, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

Nalco® EC5494A

8137

2011/03/21

April 18, 2012

RAYBO Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO 60 NORUST

8138

Mar29/11

September 13, 2012

UNIVAR Canada Ltd., Richmond, British Columbia

VANQUEST 100

8140

14 March 2011

April 25, 2012

Canyon Technical Services, Calgary, Alberta

CAN-1000

8141

03/31/2011

September 19, 2012

Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario

Niax® silicone L-854

8142

01/31/2012

April 30, 2012

Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC., Chicago, Illinois

REDICOTE® C-2914

8147

03/23/2011

April 30, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 6591N Fuel Additive

8148

8 April 2011

April 30, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

CYCOM® 890 RTM Resin

8149

07/06/2011

May 28, 2012

Champion Technologies Calgary, Alberta

Emulsotron® X-8327

8159

04/07/2011

May 10, 2012

Arkema Canada Inc., Burlington, Ontario

THERMOLITE® 176

8161

12/09/11

April 30, 2012

Weatherford Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

IC 191

8166

March 14, 2010

April 30, 2012

Weatherford Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

DO 110

8179

March 14, 2010

September 26, 2012

Weatherford Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

DO 136

8180

March 14, 2010

September 26, 2012

Suncor Energy Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

HARMONIZER

8185

5/6/2011

May 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9800CL SCREEN PRINT CLEAR

8189

2011/10/06

June 29, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9800 Process Base

8190

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9802 Opaque Black

8191

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9803 Mixing Black

8192

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

9805 Process Black

8193

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9806 Mixing White

8194

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9808 Opaque White

8195

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9810 UV Toner

8196

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9812 Magenta

8197

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9813 Red Violet

8198

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

9815 Process Magenta

8199

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9825 Transparent Red (BS)

8200

2011/10/05

April 30, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9826 BRICK RED

8201

2012/03/06

July 18, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9827 RED

8202

2012/03/06

July 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9828 TRANSPARENT RED

8203

2011/10/05

July 18, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9830 ORANGE

8204

2012/05/31

July 18, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9831 TRANSPARENT ORANGE

8205

2011/10/05

July 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9840 TRANSPARENT MEDIUM YELLOW

8206

2012/03/06

July 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9843 MEDIUM YELLOW

8207

2012/03/06

July 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9848 TRANSPARENT YELLOW

8209

2011/10/05

July 23, 2012

3M Canada Company, London, Ontario

3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9849 LEMON YELLOW

8210

2012/03/06

July 23, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 5738D Performance Additive

8217

3 May 2011

April 12, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 6590 Fuel Additive

8220

9 May 2011

April 30, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 6590D Fuel Additive

8221

9 May 2011

April 30, 2012

Weatherford Engineered Chemistry Canada Limited,* Edmonton, Alberta *formerly Weatherford International Ltd., Houston, Texas

BXL A

8222

24-May-2011

April 20, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

Nalco® 03VD042

8241

2011/06/03

May 31, 2012

Solutions Chemistry Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Coupler 2

8243

05/01/2011

May 12, 2012

Solutions Chemistry Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Non-Emulsifier

8244

05/01/2011

April 30, 2012

Solutions Chemistry Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

Rinse Aid

8245

05/01/2011

May 15, 2012

E.I. DuPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

DuPont™ Opteon™ XP10

8248

08/12/2011

April 18, 2012

Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois

AGENT 3530-17

8249

06-14-2011

August 13, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROCHEM 5K1643

8258

08-JUL-2011

May 31, 2012

GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario

PROSHIELD 61N

8259

14-JUL-2011

August 23, 2012

E.I. DuPont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario

Nutrient Solution for Microbial Cultures HORB-C

8264

January 16, 2012

June 29, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Capcure® 3-800

8265

2011/07/08

April 25, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Capcure® 40 SECHV

8266

2011/07/08

June 8, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

DSX® 3515

8268

2011/07/08

May 17, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Waterpoxy® 751

8269

2011/07/08

April 25, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Versamid® Pur 2011

8272

2011/07/08

June 14, 2012

BASF Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario

Hydropalat® 100

8273

2011/07/08

April 25, 2012

Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Bellaire, Texas

OLOA 1299W

8284

July 27, 2011

September 28, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 5742 Performance Additive

8288

8/5/2011

June 15, 2012

RAYBO Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO 82 ANTISTAT

8290

Mar21/11

July 18, 2012

RAYBO Chemical Company, Huntington, West Virginia

RAYBO 41 SPANGLE

8291

Mar17/11

June 19, 2012

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

DWP-202

8294

December 2, 2010

May 29, 2012

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

DWP-212

8295

December 4, 2010

May 29, 2012

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

DWP-931

8297

December 16, 2010

September 11, 2012

Calfrac Well Services Ltd., Calgary, Alberta

DWP-208

8301

January 25, 2012

September 11, 2012

BYK USA Inc., Wallingford, Connecticut

Anti-Terra-U 100

8305

September 27, 2011

May 15, 2012

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

PARALOID™ K-400 PROCESSING AID

8307

09/07/2011

August 23, 2012

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

ADCOTE™ 37R972

8308

08/24/2011

August 23, 2012

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

ADCOTE™ 37P295HV

8309

08/24/2011

August 23, 2012

Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario

ADCOTE™ 37R345

8310

08/24/2011

August 23, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

ADDITOL® LED 01

8318

01/04/2012

July 31, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

Nalco® VX10240

8321

2011/09/11

April 3, 2012

Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas

SCW8234 SCALE INHIBITOR

8323

9/7/2011

June 19, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

ANGLAMOL® 6043P

8326

28 September 2011

June 19, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

ANGLAMOL® 9001N

8327

13 September 2011

June 19, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 5782S

8328

18 November 2011

May 8, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

BR® 227 Primer

8329

06/29/2011

May 28, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

BR® 227 Pour Coat 30% Solids

8330

10/13/2011

May 28, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

BR® 227A Primer

8331

06/24/2011

June 21, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

BR® 1009-49 Tack Primer

8332

06/06/2011

September 25, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

BR® 127 Corrosion Inhibiting Primer, 10% Solids

8333

02/03/2011

June 21, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4898 Fuel Additive

8338

25 October 2011

June 29, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

CLASTA XP WELL STIMULATION CHEMICAL

8341

2011/10/07

September 28, 2012

Cansolv Technologies Inc., Montréal, Quebec

CANSOLV™ Absorbent DC-201

8347

2011/10/05

June 15, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

FORTIS® EC3056A

8349

2011/10/17

August 21, 2012

Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario

EC3264A

8351

2011/10/17

July 24, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

AERO® 3473 Promoter

8356

10/04/2011

July 24, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

AERO® 3739 Promoter

8357

10/04/2011

July 24, 2012

Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey

HT® 424 Thixotropic Paste, Part B

8359

06/29/2011

July 27, 2012

Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas

RE30016RBW

8363

10/21/2011

June 11, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4898AS Fuel Additive

8372

15 November 2011

July 11, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4898C Fuel Additive

8373

15 November 2011

July 11, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 4898D Fuel Additive

8374

15 November 2011

July 11, 2012

Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia

HiTEC 3440 Performance Additive

8375

11/15/2011

August 24, 2012

UOP LLC, Des Plaines, Illinois

UOP BENFIELD ACTIVATOR SOLUTION (ACT-1)

8377

February 2012

June 28, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1000

8378

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1100

8379

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1200

8380

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1300

8381

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1400

8382

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1500

8383

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1600

8384

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1700

8385

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

Core Laboratories, Houston, Texas

Spectrachem® Tracer CFT 1800

8386

06/28/12

September 11, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 48200

8409

22 November 2011

June 19, 2012

Hydro Technologies (Canada) Inc., Québec, Quebec

HY BRITE® VO

8410

22 novembre 2011

June 20, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

ANGLAMOL® 33EM

8411

22 November 2011

May 15, 2012

Momentive Performance Materials, Friendly, West Virginia

Silbreak 504

8413

03/22/2012

June 21, 2012

Momentive Performance Materials, Friendly, West Virginia

CoatOSil 1301 Siloxane Polyalkyleneoxide Copolymer

8414

03/22/2012

August 14, 2012

Baker Petrolite Corporation, Sugar Land, Texas

TRETOLITE™ RBW747 WATER CLARIFIER

8417

11/28/2011

July 19, 2012

Lonza Inc., Allendale, New Jersey

Glycolube WP 2200

8466

25-Apr-2012

July 11, 2012

The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio

LUBRIZOL® 8219H

8480

05 March 2012

September 26, 2012

Hydro Technologies (Canada) Inc., Québec, Quebec

HY BRITE® CBR-1107

8484

27 décembre 2011

August 21, 2012

Notes:

  1. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8070 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  2. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8108 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of six ingredients.
  3. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8115 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  4. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8122 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  5. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on March 5, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8123 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  6. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8140 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  7. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8147 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  8. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8148 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  9. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8149 to be Cycom® 890 RTM Resin. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is CYCOM® 890 RTM Resin.
  10. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8159 to be Emulsotron X-8327. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is Emulsotron® X-8327.
  11. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8179 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients and the concentration of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients and the concentration of five ingredients.
  12. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8180 to be the chemical identity of five ingredients and the concentration of six ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients and the concentration of four ingredients.
  13. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8185 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  14. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8189 listed the product identifier as 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9800CL Screen Print Clear and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity of six ingredients. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9800CL SCREEN PRINT CLEAR and the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  15. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8191 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9802 Opaque Black. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9802 Opaque Black.
  16. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8192 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9803 Mixing Black. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9803 Mixing Black.
  17. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8193 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9805 Process Black. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 9805 Process Black.
  18. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8194 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9806 Mixing White. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9806 Mixing White.
  19. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8195 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9808 Opaque White. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9808 Opaque White.
  20. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8196 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9810 UV Toner. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9810 UV Toner.
  21. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8197 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9812 Magenta. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9812 Magenta.
  22. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8198 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9813 Red Violet. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9813 Red Violet.
  23. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8199 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9815P Process Magenta. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 9815 Process Magenta.
  24. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8200 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9825 Transparent Red (BS). The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink 9825 Transparent Red (BS).
  25. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8201 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9826 Brick Red. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9826 BRICK RED.
  26. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8202 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9827 Red. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9827 RED.
  27. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8203 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9828 Transparent Red (YS). The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9828 TRANSPARENT RED.
  28. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8204 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9830 Orange. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9830 ORANGE.
  29. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8205 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9831 Transparent Orange. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9831 TRANSPARENT ORANGE.
  30. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8206 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9840 Transparent Medium Yellow. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9840 TRANSPARENT MEDIUM YELLOW.
  31. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8207 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9843 Medium Yellow. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9843 MEDIUM YELLOW.
  32. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8209 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9848 Transparent Yellow. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9848 TRANSPARENT YELLOW.
  33. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the product identifier bearing Registry Number 8210 to be 3M™ Screen Printing UV Ink Series 9849 Lemon Yellow. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is 3M™ SCREEN PRINTING UV INK SERIES 9849 LEMON YELLOW.
  34. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8220 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  35. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on May 21, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8221 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  36. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8241 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  37. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8265 listed the product identifier as CAPCURE 3-800 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is Capcure® 3-800 and the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  38. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8266 listed the product identifier as CAPCURE 40 SEC.HV and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is Capcure® 40 SECHV and the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  39. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8268 listed the product identifier as DSX (R) 3515 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is DSX® 3515 and the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  40. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8269 listed the product identifier as WATERPOXY® 751 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is Waterpoxy® 751 and the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  41. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8272 listed the product identifier as VERSAMID PUR 2011 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is Versamid® Pur 2011 and the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  42. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on July 30, 2011, bearing Registry Number 8273 listed the product identifier as HYDROPALAT 100 and the subject of the claim to be the chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient. The product identifier for the product and the subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is Hydropalat® 100 and the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  43. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8284 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  44. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8288 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  45. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8297 to be the chemical identity of eight ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  46. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8318 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  47. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8326 to be the chemical identity of three ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  48. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on September 24, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8327 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of three ingredients.
  49. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 3, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8331 to be the chemical identity of four ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of five ingredients.
  50. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 3, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8338 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of one ingredient.
  51. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 3, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8409 to be the chemical identity of one ingredient. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of two ingredients.
  52. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on December 3, 2011, listed the subject of the claim bearing Registry Number 8414 to be the chemical identity of two ingredients. The subject of the claim on which the screening officer issued the decision is the chemical identity of four ingredients.
  53. The Notice of Filing published in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, on February 18, 2012, bearing Registry Number 8466 listed the product identifier as Glycolube WP2200. The product identifier for the product on which the screening officer issued the decision is Glycolube WP 2200.

There were no submissions from affected parties to the screening officer with respect to any of the above claims for exemption and related MSDSs or labels.

Each of the claims for exemption listed above was found to be valid. The screening officer reached this decision after reviewing the information in support of the claim, having regard exclusively to the criteria found in section 3 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations.

Having regard for the various data readily available in the literature and any information provided by the claimant, the screening officer found that the respective MSDSs in respect of the claims bearing Registry Numbers 8161, 8201, 8204, 8258, 8305, 8308, 8309, 8310, 8328, 8351, 8363, 8410, 8411, 8417 and 8484 which were filed, complied with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Hazardous Products Act and the Controlled Products Regulations.

In the case of the claim bearing Registry Number 8141, being a claim from an employer with operations in the province of Alberta, the screening officer found that the MSDSs and label in respect of which the claim was filed did not comply with the applicable disclosure requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Code 2009 of the Province of Alberta.

In all cases where the material safety data sheet or the label was determined not to be in compliance with the relevant legislation, the screening officer offered the claimant the possibility of entering into an undertaking whereby the claimant would voluntarily make the changes necessary to bring the MSDS or the label into compliance. Pursuant to subsection 16.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Act, the claimant was given 30 days to provide the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or the label amended as necessary.

In the case of the following claims, the claimant supplied the screening officer with a signed undertaking accompanied by the MSDS or label amended as necessary within the time frame specified. The screening officer was satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified therein.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER WAS SATISFIED THAT THE CLAIMANT HAD TAKEN THE MEASURES SET OUT IN THE UNDERTAKING

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that has been disclosed on the relevant material safety data sheet or label in compliance with an undertaking.

Registry Number 8032

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for inhalation, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice to the effect that should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  5. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 33 200 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “methyl ethyl ketone”.
  6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has shown positive results for mutagenicity in somatic cells, in vivo.
Registry Number 8043

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 29 900 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “acetone”.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause cataracts in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause male reproductive organ and kidney effects in laboratory animals.
  4. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and embryotoxic effects at maternally toxic dose levels in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.
Registry Number 8108

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “calcium long-chain alkaryl sulfonate (III)”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 8115

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 30, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  3. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8122

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 25, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient with CAS Registry Number 147-14-8 in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  4. Disclose the WHMIS concentration range of hazardous “inorganic acid, isoalkyl ester, potassium salt” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  6. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  7. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.
Registry Number 8123

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 29, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “fatty acids, tall-oil, reaction product with polyalkeneamines”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “talc” in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  4. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 2 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “talc”.
Registry Number 8137

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 8138

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause sperm effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose an LC50 value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkali salt of an inorganic acid”, in an acceptable manner.
  3. Disclose an LC50 (dust, rat, 4 hours) value of 1.45 mg/L for the hazardous ingredient “sodium nitrite”.
Registry Number 8141

Date of notice confirming acceptance: January 17, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS and content of the label. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS and label as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an OSHA PEL–TWA Exposure Limit of 1 ppm with a skin notation for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alcohol solvent 2”.
  2. In relation to the symbols shown on the label, remove the two stylized T symbols.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the label for ingestion, remove the statement to give two glasses of water to drink.
Registry Number 8142

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “polyalkylene oxide”, in the controlled product together with its concentration, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 8147

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 31, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 0.41 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxylated fatty amines”.
  4. Disclose that ingestion of the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkoxylated fatty amines” has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  5. Disclose that ingestion of the confidential hazardous ingredient “glycol” has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) and neurological effects in laboratory animals.
  6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.
Registry Number 8148

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “polyether polyol”, in the controlled product together with its concentration, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 8149

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 26, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 037 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic glycidyl derivative”.
Registry Number 8159

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that long-term exposure of the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid” in the controlled product has been shown to cause kidney effects in laboratory animals.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes and skin should be washed gently with water for at least 30 minutes.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice such as the following: should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  4. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  5. Disclose an LC50 (aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of >2.5 g/m3 for the confidential hazardous ingredient “organic acid”.
  6. Disclose an LC50 (vapour, female rat, 4 hours) value of 27 000 ppm and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.29 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “isopropyl alcohol”.
Registry Number 8166

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 8, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 250 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alcohol”.
  2. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm (ceiling) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “complex alcohol”.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 224 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “acid”.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 9 530 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “complex alcohol”.
Registry Number 8179

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.
  2. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 150 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic solvent”.
  3. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 250 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “methyl alcohol”.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  6. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient “methyl alcohol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity.
Registry Number 8180

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 150 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aromatic solvent”.
  2. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 250 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “methyl alcohol”.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  4. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  5. Disclose that the confidential hazardous ingredient “methyl alcohol” in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity.
Registry Number 8185

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 26, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration of 40%–41% for the additional ingredient “phthalo green pigment”, in the controlled product.
  2. Disclose the concentration of 3%–4% for the additional ingredient “ethoxylated alcohol”, in the controlled product.
  3. Disclose the concentration of 9%–10% for the additional ingredient “silicone copolymer”, in the controlled product.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, female rat) value of 2.77 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “ethoxylated alcohol”.
Registry Number 8189

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 13, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “aliphatic urethane acrylate (2)”, in the controlled product together with its concentration, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Numbers 8190, 8191, 8192, 8193 and 8194

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the percent concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “methacrylate polymer”, “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  3. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–TWA Exposure Limit of 3 mg/m3 for the hazardous ingredient “carbon black” and show that “carbon black” has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
Registry Number 8195

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8196

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mutagenic effects in mammalian cells, in vitro.
Registry Numbers 8197, 8198, 8199 and 8200

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Numbers 8202 and 8206

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Numbers 8203, 8207 and 8209

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the percent concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Numbers 8205 and 8210

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 10, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “aliphatic urethane acrylate” and “acrylate ester” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 8217

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “methacrylate copolymer II”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Numbers 8220 and 8221

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 11, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “polyether polyol”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8222

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that ingestion of the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2” has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects and kidney effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that dermal exposure to the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2” in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects and internal hemorrhaging in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose that chronic oral and dermal exposure to the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2” in the controlled product has been shown to cause effects to the liver, heart, bone marrow, brain, spinal cord, male reproductive organs and submandibular salivary glands in laboratory animals.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be rinsed continuously with lukewarm, gently flowing water for 20 minutes; contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods should be removed under running water; and medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TVL–TWA Exposure Limit of 0.2 ppm (1 mg/m3) with a skin notation for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 5 348 mg/kg for the controlled product.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 7.46 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2”.
  8. Disclose that oral and dermal exposure to the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2” in the controlled product has been shown to cause embryotoxic, teratogenic and fetotoxic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  9. Disclose the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 2B classification for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amino alcohols 2”.
  10. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.
Registry Number 8243

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 31, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects and gastrointestinal symptoms in humans.
  3. Disclose that chronic oral and inhalation exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and developmental toxicity in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  5. Add oxides of nitrogen and hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.
  6. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  7. Disclose an LC50 (inhalation, vapour, female rat, 4 hours) value of 27 000 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “propan-2-ol”.
Registry Number 8244

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 29, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is a skin irritant.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 640 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “nonylphenol ethoxylated”.
Registry Number 8245

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 31, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that acute ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans.
  2. Disclose that chronic oral exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenicity and fetotoxicity in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  3. Disclose that ingestion by humans of liquids containing an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause maternal toxicity and birth defects in offspring.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
Registry Number 8248

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 17, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an AIHA WEEL–TWA value of 500 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “refrigerant hydrofluorocarbon A”.
Registry Number 8249

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 4, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the percent concentration for the hazardous ingredient “ethylene glycol” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the eyes and skin should be washed gently with water for at least 30 minutes.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: Never give anything by mouth if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness, or is unconscious or convulsing. If vomiting occurs naturally, have casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Also disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  4. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 mg/m3 (ceiling) for the hazardous ingredient “ethylene glycol”.
  5. Disclose the flash point as well as its method of determination.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2 700 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “ethylene glycol” and for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine ethoxylate”.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 10 500 mg/kg for the hazardous ingredient “ethylene glycol”.
  8. Disclose that ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause acute central nervous system (CNS) effects and cardiopulmonary effects, kidney damage, neurological impairment and death in humans.
  9. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause liver effects in laboratory animals.
  10. Disclose that chronic ingestion of ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause teratogenic and fetotoxic effects in the absence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  11. Correct the contradictory information pertaining to the irritancy of the product.
  12. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and D2A.
Registry Number 8259

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause liver effects, urinary bladder tumours and neurotoxicity in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 8264

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 8265

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 22, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of carbon and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8268

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 8, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “polymer of ethylene oxide, nonyl phenol and substituted diisocyanate”, in the controlled product together with its concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8269

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 22, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content, format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8273

Date of notice confirming acceptance: May 22, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
Registry Number 8284

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of two additional confidential hazardous ingredients, “hindered alkylphenol, ester” and “alkaryl phosphate”, in the controlled product together with their percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1.59 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “aryl phosphite”.
Registry Number 8288

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8290

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 8, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that chronic inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause mid-level hearing loss in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose an OSHA PEL–TWA and an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “xylene”.
  3. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 150 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “xylene”.
  4. Disclose an OSHA PEL–TWA and an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 1 000 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “ethanol”.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 6 350 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “xylene”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 4 700 mg/kg, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6 290 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, female rat, 4 hours) value of 27 000 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol”.
  7. Disclose that the hazardous ingredient “ethanol” has been classified as a suspected human carcinogen (A3) by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).
  8. Disclose that “n-butyraldoxime” interacts synergistically with an ingredient in the controlled product to cause drowsiness, shortness of breath and palpitations in humans.
Registry Number 8291

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 6, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of the confidential hazardous ingredient “fatty acid amine salt” in the controlled product.
  2. If the WHMIS hazard symbols are displayed on the MSDS, disclose the appropriate hazard symbol for a corrosive substance.
  3. Disclose an OSHA PEL–TWA and an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm together with an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 150 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “xylene” on the MSDS.
  4. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 3 523 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 6 350 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “xylene”.
  5. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 775 mg/kg and an LC50 (vapour, rat, 4 hours) value of 218 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “alkylamine”.
  6. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxicity and developmental effects in the absence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class E.
Registry Number 8294

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose a lower ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm and an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 250 ppm with a skin notation for the hazardous ingredient “n-propyl alcohol” on the MSDS.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water or milk to drink.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  4. Disclose a statement to the effect that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product; that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source; and that ignition sources should be avoided or eliminated when working with the controlled product and it should be stored away from ignition sources and heat.
  5. Disclose that the controlled product is incompatible with magnesium.
  6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is an eye irritant.
  7. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  8. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D2A, B2, D1B and D2B.
Registry Number 8295

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 28, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose a lower ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm and an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 250 ppm with a skin notation for the hazardous ingredient “n-propyl alcohol” on the MSDS.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 5.04 mL/kg for the hazardous ingredient “propyl alcohol”.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water or milk to drink.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  5. Disclose a statement to the effect that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product; that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source; and that ignition sources should be avoided or eliminated when working with the controlled product and it should be stored away from ignition sources and heat.
  6. Disclose that acute ingestion and acute inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product have been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in humans and acute dermal exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
  7. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is an eye irritant.
  8. Disclose that inhalation of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  9. Disclose that chronic oral exposure to an ingredient in the product has been shown to cause eye effects in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 8297

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Remove the conflicting statements that an ingredient in the controlled product is a skin irritant and an eye irritant.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 8 400 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “light aromatic hydrocarbon solvent”.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1.3 g/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rat) value of 1.8 mL/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “ethoxylated nonyl phenol”.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes.
  5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water or milk to drink.
  6. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice such as the following: should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  7. Disclose a statement to the effect that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product; that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source; and avoid or eliminate ignition sources when storing or working with the controlled product.
  8. Disclose that acute exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) in laboratory animals.
  9. Disclose that exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic and teratogenic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 8307

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add oxides of sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion/ decomposition products.
Registry Number 8318

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional hazardous ingredient, “ethoxylated acrylated ester”, together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that vomiting should not be induced.
Registry Number 8321

Date of notice confirming acceptance: April 20, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >200 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “fluorinated hydrocarbon”.
  2. Disclose a statement to the effect that metal containers should be grounded during the transfer of large quantities of the controlled product and that the controlled product should be stored in a well-ventilated, dry place.
Registry Number 8323

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose ingestion as a route of entry.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of the hazardous ingredient “2-hydroxyethylammonium chloride” in the controlled product with CAS Registry Number 2002-24-6.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
Registry Number 8326

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 26, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional hazardous ingredient, “alkyl sulfide”, together with the percent concentration 1–4.9%.
Registry Number 8327

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional hazardous ingredient, “alkyl sulfide”, together with the percent concentration 1–4.9%.
Registry Numbers 8329 and 8330

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 26, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give 250–300 mL of water.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice such as the following: should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
Registry Number 8331

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of the additional hazardous ingredient “diene-nitrile copolymer” together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Disclose the presence of the additional hazardous ingredient “methyl isobutyl ketone” in the controlled product, together with its CAS registry number and a percent concentration 0.2–0.3%.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes.
  4. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give 250–300 mL of water.
  5. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement such as the following: if the casualty is rapidly losing consciousness or is unconscious and vomiting occurs naturally, have the casualty lean forward to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  6. Disclose that non-sparking tools should be used for clean-up in the event of an accidental release.
  7. Disclose that the controlled product should be kept away from heat, sparks and open flame and adequate ventilation assured.
  8. Disclose correct information concerning the proper storage conditions for the controlled product.
Registry Number 8332

Date of notice confirming acceptance: November 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose a statement to the effect that trained personnel should immediately administer artificial respiration or cardiopulmonary resuscitation if breathing has stopped or the heart has stopped.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.
  4. Disclose that non-sparking tools should be used for clean-up in the event of an accidental release.
  5. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  6. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has tested positive in the Ames Salmonella assay test.
  7. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D2A.
Registry Number 8333

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 24, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice such as the following: should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.
  2. Disclose that the controlled product should be kept away from heat, sparks and open flame and adequate ventilation assured.
Registry Number 8338

Date of notice confirming acceptance: July 18, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8341

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Add hydrogen chloride to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 8347

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed.
  2. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “amine 1”, in an acceptable manner.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in classes D1B and D2B.
Registry Number 8349

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 27, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, remove the statement to give plenty of water to drink.
Registry Number 8356

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  2. Add oxides of carbon to the list of hazardous thermal decomposition products.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.
Registry Number 8357

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  2. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1B.
Registry Number 8359

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 14, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8372

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 13, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

Registry Numbers 8373 and 8374

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 13, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8375

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 25, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “alkylphenol”, in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous decomposition products.
Registry Number 8377

Date of notice confirming acceptance: August 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 0.03 ppm (IFV) for the confidential hazardous ingredient “polyalkylamine”.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for eye and skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that medical attention must be obtained immediately.
  3. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 2.83 g/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 1.59 g/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “polyalkylamine”.
  4. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product is a skin irritant.
  5. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product can be corrosive to the eyes.
  6. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class B3.
Registry Numbers 8378, 8379, 8380, 8381, 8382, 8383, 8384, 8385 and 8386

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 17, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8409

Date of notice confirming acceptance: June 26, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity of an additional hazardous ingredient, “polyolefin amide alkeneamine”, in the controlled product together with its percent concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that contaminated clothing, shoes and leather goods should be removed.
Registry Number 8413

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 16, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content of the MSDS.

Registry Number 8414

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 31, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose inhalation as a route of exposure.
Registry Number 8466

Date of notice confirming acceptance: September 5, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LC50 (rat, 1 hour) value of 58 mg/L for the confidential hazardous ingredient “alkene bis fatty acid amide”.
Registry Number 8480

Date of notice confirming acceptance: October 23, 2012

The claimant had been advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  • 1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed and medical attention must be obtained immediately.

In the case of the following claims, either the claimant did not supply the screening officer with a signed undertaking or the screening officer was not satisfied that the claimant had taken the measures set out in the undertaking in the manner and within the period specified in it. Pursuant to subsection 17.1(1) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the screening officer ordered the claimant to comply with the requirements of the relevant legislation within 30 days from the expiry of the appeal period, except that the information in respect of which the claim for exemption was made does not have to be disclosed, and to provide a copy of the amended MSDS to the screening officer within 40 days of expiry of the appeal period.

CLAIMS WHERE THE SCREENING OFFICER ORDERED THE CLAIMANT TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

Pursuant to paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of any information that the screening officer ordered to be disclosed on a material safety data sheet reviewed by the screening officer.

Registry Number 8070

Date of order: May 31, 2012

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the generic chemical identity for the hazardous ingredient “naphtha” in the controlled product together with its percent concentration.
  2. Disclose an LC50 (inhalation, aerosol, rat, 4 hours) value of >2.5 g/m3 and an LD50 (oral, rat) value of >5 000 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “naphtha”.
  3. Indicate that the flash point is 80°C for the confidential hazardous ingredient “naphtha”.
  4. Disclose that oral exposure to an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause central nervous system (CNS) effects in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 8140

Date of order: May 31, 2012

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the percent concentration for the confidential hazardous ingredients “sodium” and “compounds” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be washed gently with water for 20 minutes or until the chemical is removed and remove contaminated clothing and shoes.
  3. Disclose the concentration of the solution used to determine the pH of the controlled product.
  4. Disclose that chronic ingestion of an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause kidney effects in laboratory animals.
Registry Number 8266

Date of order: December 6, 2012

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose that an ingredient in the controlled product has been shown to cause fetotoxic effects in the presence of maternal toxicity in laboratory animals.
  2. Disclose the chemical identity of an additional confidential hazardous ingredient, “confidential epoxy polymer”, in the controlled product, together with its concentration, in an acceptable manner.
  3. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for dermal exposure, disclose a statement to the effect that immediate medical attention should be obtained.
  4. Add oxides of carbon, nitrogen and sulphur to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 0.05 ppm, an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 0.15 ppm and a skin notation for the confidential hazardous ingredient “N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-2,2′oxybis(ethylamine)”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value, an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value and an LC50 (inhalation, rat) value for the confidential hazardous ingredient “N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-2,2′oxybis(ethylamine)”, in an acceptable manner.
Registry Number 8272

Date of order: December 6, 2012

The claimant has been ordered to amend certain aspects of the content and format of the MSDS. The claimant has been further ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose the concentration range for the hazardous ingredient “propanol” in the controlled product, in an acceptable manner.
  2. Add oxides of carbon and nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  3. Disclose that if ventilation is inadequate, vapours can spread from open containers of the product and may flash back, causing a fire if they contact an ignition source.
  4. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 100 ppm for the hazardous ingredient “propanol”.
  5. Disclose an ACGIH TLV–TWA Exposure Limit of 150 ppm and an ACGIH TLV–STEL Exposure Limit of 200 ppm for the confidential hazardous ingredient “n-butylacetate”.
  6. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 1 870 mg/kg and an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 4.05 g/kg for the hazardous ingredient “propanol”.
  7. Disclose an LD50 (oral, rat) value of 10 736 mg/kg for the confidential hazardous ingredient “n-butylacetate”.

Note: The claims 8241 and 8301 were cancelled after the issuance of the decisions; thus, neither a signed undertaking was provided nor was an order issued. The screening officer has identified the following instances of non-compliance with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

Registry Number 8241

The claimant has been ordered to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. Disclose an LD50 (dermal, rabbit) value of 6.29 g/kg for the hazardous ingredient “isopropanol”.
  2. Add oxides of nitrogen to the list of hazardous combustion products.
  3. If the WHMIS classifications are stated on the MSDS, disclose that the controlled product is also in class D1A.
Registry Number 8301

The claimant had been advised to amend certain aspects of the content and wording of the MSDS. The claimant had been further advised to amend the MSDS as indicated below.

  1. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for skin contact, disclose a statement to the effect that the skin should be flushed continuously with water for at least 30 minutes.
  2. In relation to the first aid information shown on the MSDS for ingestion, disclose advice such as the following: should vomiting occur naturally, have casualty lean forward in order to reduce the risk of aspiration.

Pursuant to paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(b) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, this notice includes certain information which, in the opinion of the screening officer, should have been shown on the relevant MSDS or label.

Pursuant to subsection 24(1) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended MSDSs must be available in both official languages.

Pursuant to subsection 24(3) of the Controlled Products Regulations, amended labels must be available in both official languages.

Section 20 of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act affords the opportunity to a claimant or any affected party, within the meaning of subsection 2(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, to appeal a decision or order of a screening officer. It also affords the opportunity to an affected party to appeal an undertaking. To initiate the appeal process, a Statement of Appeal (Form 1) as prescribed by the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act Appeal Board Procedures Regulations must be completed and delivered within 45 days of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the Chief Appeals Officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3, 613-993-4331 (telephone).

GERHARD BRUINS
Acting Director, Screening Division

[12-1-o]